- From: David Browning via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:51:22 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Also happy to participate, if we can find a convenient time. Having read the slides linked to [above](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1182#issuecomment-559006455) as well as the [info](https://github.com/w3c/tr-pages/wiki/Latest-versions-proposal-for-leveled-specifications) that the slide links to, it seems to me that what's happening here nearly fits quite well with what we want - users can choose to reference the 'sequenced' standards such as https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-1/ to refer to the latest of DCAT 1, or https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/ to refer to the latest of DCAT 2 etc, while if users are happy trusting our story about backward compatibility then they can use https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/. We should definitely explain that in the docs though. My concern is that https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/ doesn't point at a REC today/at this point in the process, but rather at PR (and presumably did at CR too). If that was deemed appropriate behaviour by the plenary/AC (or at least they did not disagree) then ....okay... :neutral_face: -- GitHub Notification of comment by davebrowning Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1182#issuecomment-559144448 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2019 15:51:24 UTC