Re: [dxwg] Specify the realisation order of precedence for conflicting profile negotiation situations (#505)

I don't think the use of MAY or the alternative suggested makes any difference! 

I think the sentence:

> If other functional profiles of the abstract model are defined each MUST specify order of precedence.

Is problematic since we can't force future Functional Profiles to respect other FP's claims to order of precedence. Also, there is no canonical mechanism for order of precedence so we can't test for MUST.

After discussion in the subgroup, we feel that more discussion is needed about this issue so we will list it in the 3PWD.




-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/505#issuecomment-550261502 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2019 11:05:35 UTC