Thursday, 28 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Poll for PROF to be published as a WG Note
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- [dxwg] no content-type charset value in header of https://www.w3.org/ns/dcat.ttl (#1183)
- Dataset Exchange Working Group Charter Extended until 31 January 2020
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
Wednesday, 27 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Question on IETF definition of Profile (#1002)
- Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Closed: [dxwg] correcting the naming of realizations of profile negotiation (#1160)
- Re: [dxwg] correcting the naming of realizations of profile negotiation (#1160)
- Re: [dxwg] Add motivating text to the HTTP Alternate Representation Data Model (#1102)
- Conneg P published as WD
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by plehegar
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by plehegar
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial suggestions
- Re: [dxwg] Query string implementation of profile selection (#544)
Tuesday, 26 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Query string implementation of profile selection (#544)
- Closed: [dxwg] Definition and note of prof:hasToken (#723)
- Re: [dxwg] Definition and note of prof:hasToken (#723)
- Re: [dxwg] Query string implementation of profile selection (#544)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Definition and note of prof:hasToken (#723)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Conneg to PWD3
- Re: [dxwg] Prof 3 pwd editorial (#1180)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof 3 pwd editorial (#1180)
Monday, 25 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] SheX feedback on example ResourceDescriptor (#1053)
- Re: [dxwg] Update to Intro (#1174)
- Re: [dxwg] Broken Creative Commons link (#1169)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Replace isInheritedFrom with a subproperty of rdfs:isDefinedBy (#842)
- Re: [dxwg] SheX feedback on example ResourceDescriptor (#1053)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Suggested updates to definition of PROF constructs (#1061)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Prof 3 pwd editorial
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Prof 3 pwd editorial
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Prof 3 pwd issues
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Prof 3 pwd issues
- Closed: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Closed: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Suggested updates to definition of PROF constructs (#1061)
- Re: [dxwg] PROF relationship to other vocabularies (#797)
- Re: [dxwg] Suggested updates to definition of PROF constructs (#1061)
- Closed: [dxwg] Unused namspaces in profilescont.ttl (#688)
- Re: [dxwg] Review prof:isProfileOf & its relation to dc:conformsTo (#1043)
- Re: [dxwg] Find from a profile description, uris of online resources available to convert it to another profile (#754)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Definition and note of prof:hasToken (#723)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Alignment / differentiation with OWL (#696)
- Re: [dxwg] SheX feedback on example ResourceDescriptor (#1053)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify use of dct:conformsTo perhaps with additional properties (#660)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Closed: [dxwg] Complete PROF/x alignments (#405)
- [dxwg] Reference or align with JSON-LD (#1178)
- Re: [dxwg] Complete PROF/x alignments (#405)
- Re: [dxwg] Machine understanding of "profile" (#796)
- Re: [dxwg] Machine understanding of "profile" (#796)
- Re: [dxwg] Machine understanding of "profile" (#796)
- Re: [dxwg] PROF relationship to other vocabularies (#797)
- Re: [dxwg] PROF namespace in document (#798)
- Re: [dxwg] PROF relationship to other vocabularies (#797)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Comments on "inheritance" (#795)
- Re: [dxwg] ShEx community comment on resource descriptor (#794)
- Re: [dxwg] Bad Geonames URL (#1176)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] What is the level of the inheritance link? (#857)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
Sunday, 24 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Jaroslav's profiles ont doc edits (#570)
- Re: PROF Issue
- Re: [dxwg] SheX feedback on example ResourceDescriptor (#1053)
- Re: [dxwg] Suggested updates to definition of PROF constructs (#1061)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Plenary Meeting: 2019-11-26 - No meeting, but we still have work to do
- [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- [dxwg] Bad Geonames URL (#1176)
Saturday, 23 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Generalise diagrams (#826)
- Need more votes on Conneg!
- [dxwg] Improved link to ISO codes (#1175)
Friday, 22 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Generalise diagrams (#826)
- Re: [dxwg] What does prof:profileOf entail? (#507)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof Ont Test Suite tools (#407)
- Re: [dxwg] Reference ADMS (#401)
- Re: [dxwg] Makx's profiles ont doc concerns (#572)
- Closed: [dxwg] Indicate the UCR doc early in the Ontology doc (#749)
- Closed: [dxwg] Links in 'Participate' header not working (#714)
- Re: [dxwg] Makx's profiles ont doc concerns (#572)
- PROF Issue
- Re: [dxwg] Jaroslav's profiles ont doc edits (#570)
- Re: [dxwg] What does prof:profileOf entail? (#507)
- Re: [dxwg] Complete CSIRO's profiles implementation description (#408)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof Ont Test Suite tools (#407)
- Re: [dxwg] Generalise diagrams (#826)
- Re: [dxwg] Generalise diagrams (#826)
Thursday, 21 November 2019
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update to Intro
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update to Intro
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- Re: [dxwg] updating affiliation to include previous one (#1173)
- Re: [dxwg] updating affiliation to include previous one (#1173)
- Re: [dxwg] updating affiliation to include previous one (#1173)
- Re: [dxwg] updating affiliation to include previous one (#1173)
- Re: [dxwg] updating affiliation to include previous one (#1173)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: updating affiliation to include previous one
- [dxwg] Pull Request: updating affiliation to include previous one
- Closed: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Closed: [dxwg] Ambiguous relationship in Figure 1 (#687)
- Closed: [dxwg] Ambiguity in Abstract and Introduction (#686)
- Closed: [dxwg] Add Usage Notes to dct:conformsTo (#916)
- Re: [dxwg] Add Usage Notes to dct:conformsTo (#916)
- Re: [dxwg] Axiomitise transitivity of dct:conformsTo through isProfileOf relationships (#844)
- Re: [dxwg] Generalise diagrams (#826)
- Fw: Agenda for CNEG subgroup meeting 2019-11-21T10:00:00Z
Wednesday, 20 November 2019
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- Agenda for CNEG subgroup meeting 2019-11-21T10:00:00Z
- Re: [dxwg] Removed companyURL for Lars (#1172)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Removed companyURL for Lars
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Removed companyURL for Lars
- Re: [dxwg] correcting the naming of realizations of profile negotiation (#1160)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: small into wording change for FP naming consistency
- [dxwg] Pull Request: small into wording change for FP naming consistency
- Re: [dxwg] correcting the naming of realizations of profile negotiation (#1160)
- Poll: Publish 3PWD of Conneg
- Re: DXWG plenary of Nov. 19 cancelled
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
Tuesday, 19 November 2019
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Change of team contact and chairs
- Re: [dxwg] Broken Creative Commons link (#1169)
- [dxwg] Broken Creative Commons link (#1169)
- Re: DXWG plenary of Nov. 19 cancelled
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Address #542
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Address #677
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT remove at risk notes
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT remove at risk notes (#1168)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT remove at risk notes (#1168)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT remove at risk notes (#1168)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT remove at risk notes (#1168)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT remove at risk notes
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by larsgsvensson
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by larsgsvensson
- Re: [dxwg] Add motivating text to the HTTP Alternate Representation Data Model (#1102)
- Re: [dxwg] Add motivating text to the HTTP Alternate Representation Data Model (#1102)
- Re: [dxwg] Query string implementation of profile selection (#544)
- Re: [dxwg] Query string implementation of profile selection (#544)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg Implementation Report
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg Implementation Report
- Re: [dxwg] changing Link header rel="self" to rel="default" (#1134)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg self canonical
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg self canonical
- DCAT PR publication
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- Re: [dxwg] correcting the naming of realizations of profile negotiation (#1160)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg 3 pwd editorial
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg 3 pwd editorial
- Re: [dxwg] Complete OGC implementation description (#389)
- Closed: [dxwg] Conneg Editorial Nits (#1088)
- Closed: [dxwg] Content-Profile default behaviour not explicit for single profiles or single profile hierarchy (#1149)
- Re: [dxwg] Content-Profile default behaviour not explicit for single profiles or single profile hierarchy (#1149)
- Re: [dxwg] Add ref to #505 - order or precedence and remove MUST (#1163)
Monday, 18 November 2019
- DXWG plenary of Nov. 19 cancelled
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg 3 pwd docchecks editorial
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg 3 pwd docchecks editorial
- Re: [dxwg] changing Link header rel="self" to rel="default" (#1134)
- Re: [dxwg] Add ref to #505 - order or precedence and remove MUST (#1163)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
Wednesday, 13 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] changing Link header rel="self" to rel="default" (#1134)
- Re: [dxwg] Drop "family of documents" section from conneg (#1105)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series (#868)
Tuesday, 12 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Drop "family of documents" section from conneg (#1105)
- Re: DXWG Plenary Meeting - 2019-11-12T21:00:00
- Re: [dxwg] Drop "family of documents" section from conneg (#1105)
- Re: [dxwg] Drop "family of documents" section from conneg (#1105)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Tweaks to handle #1149 - remove MUST ref to HTTP
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add ref to #505 - order or precedence and remove MUST
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series (#868)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series (#868)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add ref to #505 - order or precedence and remove MUST
- Re: [dxwg] Specify the realisation order of precedence for conflicting profile negotiation situations (#505)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Tweaks to handle #1149 - remove MUST ref to HTTP
- Re: [dxwg] Content-Profile default behaviour not explicit for single profiles or single profile hierarchy (#1149)
Monday, 11 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] Content-Profile default behaviour not explicit for single profiles or single profile hierarchy (#1149)
- Re: [dxwg] Content-Profile default behaviour not explicit for single profiles or single profile hierarchy (#1149)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series (#868)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
Sunday, 10 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- DXWG Plenary Meeting - 2019-11-12T21:00:00
Thursday, 7 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
Wednesday, 6 November 2019
- [dxwg] Remove Open World declarations from AltR (#1161)
- dxwg-ACTION-384: Put issue 505 with updated title and note into 3pwd
- Re: [dxwg] Specify the realisation order of precedence for conflicting profile negotiation situations (#505)
- Closed: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)
- dxwg-ACTION-383: Update issue so it has a meaningful question as per request - and add issue to 3pwd via a pr
- Re: [dxwg] Appendix showing an example of of conneg use in DCAT (#1042)
- Closed: [dxwg] Appendix showing an example of of conneg use in DCAT (#1042)
- Re: [dxwg] Replace "functional profiles" with "methods" or "implementations" (#1106)
- Closed: [dxwg] Replace "functional profiles" with "methods" or "implementations" (#1106)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] Content-Profile default behaviour not explicit for single profiles or single profile hierarchy (#1149)
- dxwg-ACTION-382: Create pr for 1149 for 3pwd
- Re: [dxwg] changing Link header rel="self" to rel="default" (#1134)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- Re: [dxwg] correcting the naming of realizations of profile negotiation (#1160)
- Additional Implementation of DCAT2
Tuesday, 5 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] correcting the naming of realizations of profile negotiation (#1160)
- [dxwg] correcting the naming of realizations of profile negotiation (#1160)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg editorial (#1132)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg editorial (#1132)
- Re: [dxwg] specification of range restrictions (#1129)
- Closed: [dxwg] Why are resolutions are defined in terms of 'minimum' separation? (#1154)
- Re: [dxwg] Why are resolutions are defined in terms of 'minimum' separation? (#1154)
- Re: [dxwg] Why are resolutions are defined in terms of 'minimum' separation? (#1154)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg editorial (#1132)
- Re: [dxwg] Why are resolutions are defined in terms of 'minimum' separation? (#1154)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg editorial (#1132)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add .md suffix
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Rename dcat-tr-to-pr to dcat-tr-to-pr.md
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Changes to make respec show correct links
- Re: [dxwg] Changes to make respec show correct links (#1157)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Changes to make respec show correct links
- Re: [dxwg] Why are resolutions are defined in terms of 'minimum' separation? (#1154)
- Re: [dxwg] What kind of dataset is dataset-001? (#1155)
- Re: [dxwg] naming convention of dcat:catalog (#1156)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] Conneg editorial (#1132)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- Re: [dxwg] changing Link header rel="self" to rel="default" (#1134)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- [dxwg] naming convention of dcat:catalog (#1156)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- Re: [dxwg] Reduce profile list network traffic burden by making optional unless explicitly asked for (#1152)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- Re: [dxwg] changing Link header rel="self" to rel="default" (#1134)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- [dxwg] What kind of dataset is dataset-001? (#1155)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- Re: [dxwg] Why are resolutions are defined in terms of 'minimum' separation? (#1154)
- Re: Real examples for Conneg?
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
Monday, 4 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] Why are resolutions are defined in terms of 'minimum' separation? (#1154)
- Re: Real examples for Conneg?
- Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Poll for DCAT v2 to PR
- [dxwg] Why are resolutions are defined in terms of 'minimum' separation? (#1154)
- [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)
- Re: [dxwg] Add support for errata in Req track documents (e.g. DCAT) (#545)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] Create dsct-tr-to-pr (#1151)
- Re: Real examples for Conneg?
- Re: [dxwg] Create dsct-tr-to-pr (#1151)
- Re: Real examples for Conneg?
- ConnegP Agenda - note changed time
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- [dxwg] Reduce profile list network traffic burden by making optional unless explicitly asked for (#1152)
Sunday, 3 November 2019
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Create dsct-tr-to-pr
- Real examples for Conneg?
- Reminder: DCAT to PR poll - REPLY NOW!
- DXWG Plenary 2019-11-05T20:00:00
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
Saturday, 2 November 2019
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Negative vote in DCAT poll
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)