Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)

There’s a whole Profiles Vocabulary there to assist with linking human documents and SHACL files etc. to identifying URIs for standards/profiles for use with conformsTo!


Nicholas Car
Data Systems Architect
SURROUND Australia
0477 560 177

> On 8 Nov 2019, at 6:09 am, Simon Cox via GitHub <> wrote:
> Machine actionability all round would be terrific. But the current reality is that there is a huge diversity of expressions of 'standards' and the chances of this converging on a small number of machine actionable forms is very very slight. Like @makxdekkers says, this would be a suitable thing for a profile to specify. 
> -- 
> GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
> Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 7 November 2019 22:07:28 UTC