Re: [dxwg] Inconsistency between usage note of dcat:themeTaxonomy and range of dcat:theme? (#1153)

@kcoyle yes removing the range of dcat:theme (and keeping it merely as an 'expected range' in a usage note) would be an option. I'm be keen on keeping dcat:theme used with URIs though. It can be very valuable to force a bit of structure here. And it's good to keep this as a difference with [dcat:keyword](dcat:keyword). Otherwise implementers may wonder which one to use, leading to a diversity of usages that would probably be harmful for interoperability.

GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2019 09:09:11 UTC