Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)

OK - from my perspective I think the response is definitive and DCAT is not broken and there are examples enough to back it up. Future work might just be to tune the way its presented or a primer. 

This is perhaps at odds with the statement "that it applies to the subject of the triple itself, not a resource that the content of the subject may be describing. " but I guess thats something for the DCMI community to raise formally if they think all the examples in DCAT and other specs are inconsistent. 

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 3 November 2019 03:38:56 UTC