- From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 02:30:34 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Addressing the ShEx community comments: > The relation of standard to profile also seems unclear in practice. Some people consider a specification to be a "standard" when published by a "standards" body such as ISO but not if published by, say, W3C or DCMI. We have used the word 'specification' and/or throughout the document and have given a series of definitions within it too that were agreed on by the WG. > ...because the domain of prof:hasProfile is dct:Standard, one could infer that any profile profiled by another profile is, ipso facto, also a standard. All `prof:Profile` instances are `dct:Standard` given `prof:Profile rdfs:subClassOf dct:Standard`. The property linking profiles & standards, `prof:isProfileOf`, is now the only linking property with the inverse that you reference `prof:hasProfile` having been removed from the vocabulary. > Should a vocabulary I just invented for this profile be considered a "standard" with respect to the profile? In that case, it's likely a vocab supporting a profile/standard would be best described as a profile resource and formalised as a `ResourceDescriptor` with a relevant role. Is there any further work/explanation needed here? -- GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/792#issuecomment-557962967 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 25 November 2019 02:30:35 UTC