ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2010: by date

Thursday, 30 September 2010
- Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) Adam Barth
Wednesday, 29 September 2010
- Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) Anne van Kesteren
- 403 description clarifications Thomson, Martin
Tuesday, 28 September 2010
- WG Action: RECHARTER: Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) IESG Secretary
- Re: Issue 141: "should we have an auth scheme registry" Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 141: "should we have an auth scheme registry" Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 141: "should we have an auth scheme registry" Cyrus Daboo
Saturday, 25 September 2010
- Re: draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-18.txt Peter Pöml
- Re: Link Relation Registry initial contents Julian Reschke
- Re: Link Relation Registry initial contents Eric J. Bowman
Friday, 24 September 2010
- Re: Link Relation Registry initial contents Julian Reschke
Thursday, 23 September 2010
- Specific non-2616 MS RFC implementation William A. Rowe Jr.
- Re: Unifying & standardizing X-Moz & X-Purpose headers Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Unifying & standardizing X-Moz & X-Purpose headers Adam Barth
- Unifying & standardizing X-Moz & X-Purpose headers 蓋文彼德斯
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Dan Winship
- Link Relation Registry initial contents Nathan
- IANA hanges to draft-nottingham-http-link-header Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 22 September 2010
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Adam Barth
- Re: parsing of unknown challenges, was: Ticket 237 Thomas Broyer
- Multiple Content-Type headers (was: Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths) Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Multiple content-types, was: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Adam Barth
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Adam Barth
- Multiple content-types, was: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) Julian Reschke
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Willy Tarreau
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Julian Reschke
- [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-kitten-digest-to-historic-02.txt] Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [#177] Realm required on challenges Julian Reschke
- Re: [#177] Realm required on challenges Julian Reschke
- Re: parsing of unknown challenges, was: Ticket 237 Julian Reschke
- Re: parsing of unknown challenges, was: Ticket 237 Bjoern Hoehrmann
- parsing of unknown challenges, was: Ticket 237 Julian Reschke
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Mark Nottingham
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Julian Reschke
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-02.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Re: [#177] Realm required on challenges Mark Nottingham
Tuesday, 21 September 2010
- Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) Julian Reschke
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths 陈智昌
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Adam Barth
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Mark Nottingham
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths 陈智昌
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths 陈智昌
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Willy Tarreau
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Mark Nottingham
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Mark Nottingham
Monday, 20 September 2010
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) Julian Reschke
- Re: [#232] User-Agent Guidelines (proposal) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [#232] User-Agent Guidelines (proposal) Julian Reschke
- Re: New issue: p5-range 5.4.2, proxy recommendations regarding 200 responses to Range Yves Lafon
- Re: [#232] User-Agent Guidelines (proposal) Adam Barth
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Mark Nottingham
- Re: [#232] User-Agent Guidelines (proposal) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [#232] User-Agent Guidelines (proposal) Adam Barth
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Adam Barth
- [#232] User-Agent Guidelines (proposal) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Julian Reschke
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Mark Nottingham
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Julian Reschke
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Adrien de Croy
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Adam Barth
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Mark Nottingham
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Anne van Kesteren
- RE: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Thomson, Martin
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Mark Nottingham
- RE: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Thomson, Martin
- Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Willy Tarreau
- [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths Mark Nottingham
Sunday, 19 September 2010
- Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) Julian Reschke
Thursday, 16 September 2010
- Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-01.txt Julian Reschke
- how to handle "Not Yet Available"? Nathan
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Wednesday, 15 September 2010
- ticket #78 (Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate) Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 141: "should we have an auth scheme registry" Cyrus Daboo
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 141: "should we have an auth scheme registry" Julian Reschke
- Re: Protocol switch before, or after the 101 response? Henrik Nordström
- Re: Protocol switch before, or after the 101 response? Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Julian Reschke
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts Willy Tarreau
- Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts Mark Nottingham
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Nathan
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) Martin J. Dürst
Tuesday, 14 September 2010
- WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) IESG Secretary
- Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts Willy Tarreau
- Re: [#177] Realm required on challenges Julian Reschke
- Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts Julian Reschke
- Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts Willy Tarreau
- Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts Mark Nottingham
Monday, 13 September 2010
- Issue 141: "should we have an auth scheme registry" Julian Reschke
- Issue 195, was: Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header Julian Reschke
- Re: Ticket 237 (absorbing more of 2617), was: Minutes for Maastricht Julian Reschke
- No WG meeting at IETF 79 Mark Nottingham
Sunday, 12 September 2010
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt Julian Reschke
Saturday, 11 September 2010
- Re: Protocol switch before, or after the 101 response? Henrik Nordström
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Henrik Nordström
- Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Protocol switch before, or after the 101 response? Bjoern Hoehrmann
Wednesday, 8 September 2010
- re: effective request URI/target URI, issues 221 & 222, was: Issues addressed, by the -10 drafts =JeffH
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Willy Tarreau
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Mark Nottingham
Tuesday, 7 September 2010
- Re: effective request URI/target URI, issues 221 & 222, was: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts Mark Nottingham
Monday, 6 September 2010
- Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt Henrik Nordström
- Re: effective request URI/target URI, issues 221 & 222, was: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts Julian Reschke
- Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt Julian Reschke
Sunday, 5 September 2010
- Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt Henrik Nordström
- Re: POST with empty body Henrik Nordström
- Re: remove/deprecate User-Agent header? Henrik Nordström
- Re: conditional-request implementation feedback Henrik Nordström
Saturday, 4 September 2010
- Issue 123 (factor out Content-Disposition), was: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt Julian Reschke
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Friday, 3 September 2010
- Re: POST with empty body Nathan
- Re: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-03.txt [ new WG item ] Mark Nottingham
- Re: POST with empty body Mark Nottingham
Thursday, 2 September 2010
- Re: POST with empty body Willy Tarreau
- Re: POST with empty body Jan Algermissen
- Re: POST with empty body David Morris
- POST with empty body Darrel Miller
- Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts Willy Tarreau
- Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts Mark Nottingham
- Re: New issue: p5-range 5.4.2, proxy recommendations regarding 200 responses to Range Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 1 September 2010
- Re: IPR Disclosure: CNRS's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4768, RFC 2069, RFC 4169, and draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-11 Robert Collins
- Re: IPR Disclosure: CNRS's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4768, RFC 2069, RFC 4169, and draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-11 Julian Reschke
- RE: IPR Disclosure: CNRS's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4768, RFC 2069, RFC 4169, and draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-11 Paul Leach
- Re: IPR Disclosure: CNRS's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4768, RFC 2069, RFC 4169, and draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-11 Mark Nottingham
Tuesday, 31 August 2010
- IPR Disclosure: CNRS's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4768, RFC 2069, RFC 4169, and draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-11 IETF Secretariat
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Patrick McManus
- Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-03.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Mark Nottingham
Sunday, 29 August 2010
- Re: New issue: p5-range 5.4.2, proxy recommendations regarding 200 responses to Range Henrik Nordström
Friday, 27 August 2010
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Julian Reschke
- Re: Charter revision Julian Reschke
Thursday, 26 August 2010
- Re: Charter revision William A. Rowe Jr.
- Issue 241 conditional header eval order, was: conditional-request implementation feedback Julian Reschke
- Re: Charter revision Julian Reschke
Wednesday, 25 August 2010
- Re: Charter revision William A. Rowe Jr.
- Re: Charter revision Henrik Nordström
- Re: Charter revision Barry Leiba
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-02.txt Julian Reschke
- Charter revision Mark Nottingham
- Issue: expect 100-continue in HTTP/1.0 requests Henrik Nordström
Tuesday, 24 August 2010
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-02.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-02.txt Eric J. Bowman
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Anne van Kesteren
- Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-02.txt Julian Reschke
- conditional-request implementation feedback Eric J. Bowman
Monday, 23 August 2010
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Patrick McManus
Friday, 20 August 2010
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Adam Barth
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Julian Reschke
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects [#238] Mark Nottingham
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects [#238] Adam Barth
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects [#238] Mark Nottingham
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Dirk Pranke
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Roy T. Fielding
Thursday, 19 August 2010
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Dirk Pranke
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Roy T. Fielding
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Adam Barth
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Roy T. Fielding
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Robert Sayre
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Adam Barth
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Roy T. Fielding
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Adam Barth
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Roy T. Fielding
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Julian Reschke
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Mark Pauley
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Adam Barth
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Roy T. Fielding
- Re: remove/deprecate User-Agent header? Willy Tarreau
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Julian Reschke
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Julian Reschke
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Mark Pauley
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Adam Barth
- Re: remove/deprecate User-Agent header? J Ross Nicoll
- Re: remove/deprecate User-Agent header? Julian Reschke
- Re: remove/deprecate User-Agent header? Paul Wise
- Re: remove/deprecate User-Agent header? Julian Reschke
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Julian Reschke
- remove/deprecate User-Agent header? Paul Wise
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Anne van Kesteren
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Julian Reschke
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Anne van Kesteren
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Julian Reschke
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Anne van Kesteren
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Julian Reschke
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Yves Lafon
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Julian Reschke
- Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-portal-01.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-portal-00.txt Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 18 August 2010
- Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects Robert Sayre
- User confirmation and 307 redirects Adam Barth
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-portal-00.txt Dan Winship
Monday, 16 August 2010
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-01.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-01.txt Anne van Kesteren
- Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-01.txt Julian Reschke
Friday, 13 August 2010
- Re: RFC 5987 on Character Set and Language Encoding for Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Header Field Parameters Mark Nottingham
- Fwd: RFC 5987 on Character Set and Language Encoding for Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Header Field Parameters Julian Reschke
- Re: Proposal for work on an efficient, browser-friendly, HTTP-based communication protocol for fine-grained information exchange Wenbo Zhu
Thursday, 12 August 2010
- Scope of body in an OPTIONS response Nathan
- Re: Fwd: Proposal for work on an efficient, browser-friendly, HTTP-based communication protocol for fine-grained information exchange Kris Zyp
- Fwd: Proposal for work on an efficient, browser-friendly, HTTP-based communication protocol for fine-grained information exchange Julian Reschke
Wednesday, 11 August 2010
- Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-00.txt Julian Reschke
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Willy Tarreau
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Willy Tarreau
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Willy Tarreau
- RE: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Thomson, Martin
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Willy Tarreau
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Willy Tarreau
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Willy Tarreau
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Willy Tarreau
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Mark Nottingham
- RE: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Thomson, Martin
Tuesday, 10 August 2010
- Re: rewritten section on message body and length Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Ticket 237 (absorbing more of 2617), was: Minutes for Maastricht Julian Reschke
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Willy Tarreau
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Adrien de Croy
- RE: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Thomson, Martin
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Willy Tarreau
- Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt Mark Nottingham
Friday, 6 August 2010
- Re: http URI grammar Roy T. Fielding
- RE: http URI grammar Daniel Stenberg
- RE: http URI grammar Eric Lawrence
Thursday, 5 August 2010
- Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-portal-00.txt Stefan Eissing
- Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-portal-00.txt Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 4 August 2010
- http URI grammar Yves Lafon
- HTTPbis -11 drafts published Julian Reschke
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-11.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-11.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-11.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-11.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-11.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-11.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-11.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Request for feedback on HTTP Streaming overview (draft-wu-http-streaming-optimization-ps) Alexey Melnikov
Tuesday, 3 August 2010
- Re: NEW: #225: PUT and DELETE invalidation vs. staleness Mark Nottingham
Thursday, 29 July 2010
- Re: Migrating CONNECT and Upgrade details from RFC2817 Daniel Stenberg
- Re: issue 79: must understand content-* header fields or fail Mark Nottingham
- Re: Migrating CONNECT and Upgrade details from RFC2817 Willy Tarreau
- RE: Migrating CONNECT and Upgrade details from RFC2817 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
- Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW: #225: PUT and DELETE invalidation vs. staleness Yves Lafon
- Migrating CONNECT and Upgrade details from RFC2817 Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW: #225: PUT and DELETE invalidation vs. staleness Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW: #225: PUT and DELETE invalidation vs. staleness Yves Lafon
- Re: Ticket 237 (absorbing more of 2617), was: Minutes for Maastricht Julian Reschke
Wednesday, 28 July 2010
- Ticket 237 (absorbing more of 2617), was: Minutes for Maastricht Julian Reschke
- Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs Martin J. Dürst
- Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs Reto Bachmann-Gmür
- sending Last-Modified in 304 and 206 responses Roy T. Fielding
- Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs Julian Reschke
- rewritten section on Content-Location Roy T. Fielding
- Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs Alexey Melnikov
- Re: rewritten section on message body and length Willy Tarreau
- Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs Mark Baker
- rewritten section on message body and length Roy T. Fielding
- Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs Adrien de Croy
- Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs William A. Rowe Jr.
- Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs Adrien de Croy
- disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs Roy T. Fielding
Tuesday, 27 July 2010
- Minutes for Maastricht Mark Nottingham
Monday, 26 July 2010
- Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses Roy T. Fielding
- Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses Yves Lafon
- Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses Yves Lafon
- Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses Willy Tarreau
- Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses Moore, Jonathan
- Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses Yves Lafon
- Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses Mark Nottingham
- Re: Revised Maastricht Agenda Mark Nottingham
- Reminder: HTTPbis WG meeting today Julian Reschke
Sunday, 25 July 2010
- Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses Moore, Jonathan
- Re: proposal for issue #178 Henrik Nordström
- RE: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods? Thomson, Martin
- Re: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods? Mark Nottingham
Saturday, 24 July 2010
- RE: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods? Thomson, Martin
- Re: #122 (MIME-Version not listed in P1, general header fields) Julian Reschke
- NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses Mark Nottingham
- Forcing validation Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods? Willy Tarreau
- NEW: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods? Mark Nottingham
- Re: [#203] Max-forwards and extension methods Julian Reschke
Friday, 23 July 2010
- Issue 208, was: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts Julian Reschke
- NEW: #224 - Header Classifications Mark Nottingham
- NEW: #223: Allowing heuristic freshness for new status codes Mark Nottingham
- NEW: #225: PUT and DELETE invalidation vs. staleness Mark Nottingham
- Issue 39, was: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts Julian Reschke
- Re: New issue: p5-range 5.4.2, proxy recommendations regarding 200 responses to Range Yves Lafon
- A note about the issues list and editorial workflow Mark Nottingham
- issue 226, "proxies not supporting certain methods" Julian Reschke
- Re: proposal for issue #178 Yves Lafon
- Re: Revised Maastricht Agenda Mark Nottingham
- Re: effective request URI/target URI, issues 221 & 222, was: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts Roy T. Fielding
- effective request URI/target URI, issues 221 & 222, was: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts Julian Reschke
Thursday, 22 July 2010
- Re: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts Roy T. Fielding
- Issues addressed by the -10 drafts Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 21 July 2010
- Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication Willy Tarreau
- Re: Revised Maastricht Agenda Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication Julian Reschke
Tuesday, 20 July 2010
- Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication Roy T. Fielding
Monday, 19 July 2010
- Revised Maastricht Agenda Mark Nottingham
- Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication Willy Tarreau
- Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication William A. Rowe Jr.
- Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication Roy T. Fielding
- Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication Julian Reschke
Friday, 16 July 2010
- Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header Henrik Nordström
- Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header Daniel Stenberg
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Willy Tarreau
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Roy T. Fielding
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Adrien de Croy
- RE: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Thomson, Martin
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Willy Tarreau
Thursday, 15 July 2010
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Roy T. Fielding
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Willy Tarreau
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header Henrik Nordström
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Willy Tarreau
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Roy T. Fielding
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Mark Nottingham
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Adrien de Croy
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Roy T. Fielding
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Adrien de Croy
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Mark Nottingham
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Adrien de Croy
- Re: parsing decimals, was: HTTPbis -10 drafts published Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 14 July 2010
- Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header Daniel Stenberg
- Re: [#193] Trailers and intermediaries Julian Reschke
- Re: parsing decimals, was: HTTPbis -10 drafts published Willy Tarreau
- parsing decimals, was: HTTPbis -10 drafts published Julian Reschke
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header Willy Tarreau
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published Willy Tarreau
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published Julian Reschke
- Re: [#193] Trailers and intermediaries Henrik Nordström
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published Willy Tarreau
- Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header Mark Nottingham
- Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header Roy T. Fielding
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published Mark Nottingham
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published Willy Tarreau
- Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header Mark Nottingham
- Re: issue 79: must understand content-* header fields or fail Mark Nottingham
- Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published Mark Nottingham
- [#203] Max-forwards and extension methods Mark Nottingham
- [#193] Trailers and intermediaries Mark Nottingham
- Re: [#208] IANA registry for cache-control directives Mark Nottingham
Tuesday, 13 July 2010
- Re: DRAFT HTTPbis agenda for Maastricht Julian Reschke
- HTTPbis -10 drafts published Julian Reschke
Monday, 12 July 2010
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-04.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-10.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-10.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-10.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-10.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-10.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-10.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-10.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- DRAFT HTTPbis agenda for Maastricht Mark Nottingham
Friday, 9 July 2010
- Re: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt Mark Nottingham
- Re: httpbis-p2 : 1xx messages may not always be treated as 100 Willy Tarreau
- Re: httpbis-p2 : 1xx messages may not always be treated as 100 Yves Lafon
- Re: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt Salvatore Loreto
- Re: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt Mark Nottingham
- RE: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt Thomson, Martin
- Re: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt Mark Nottingham
Thursday, 8 July 2010
- Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] David Morris
- Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] Yves Lafon
- Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] Willy Tarreau
- Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] Willy Tarreau
- Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 7 July 2010
- Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] Roy T. Fielding
- Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] Mark Nottingham
Tuesday, 6 July 2010
- httpbis-p2 : 1xx messages may not always be treated as 100 Willy Tarreau
- RE: I-D Submission: draft-lee-httpext-metadata-00.txt 이문상
Sunday, 4 July 2010
- Re: I-D Submission: draft-lee-httpext-metadata-00.txt Eran Hammer-Lahav
- RE: I-D Submission: draft-lee-httpext-metadata-00.txt 이문상
- RE: I-D Submission: draft-lee-httpext-metadata-00.txt 이문상
Friday, 2 July 2010
- RE: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt Thomson, Martin
Thursday, 1 July 2010
- Re: Questions (errata?) about caching authenticated responses [#174] Mark Nottingham
- Re: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt Mark Nottingham

Last message date: Thursday, 30 September 2010 07:47:39 UTC
Archived on: Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:48 UTC

ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2010 by date