W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

RE: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods?

From: ? <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 03:10:24 +0800
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03EB7734EC@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>

> Anyone think we should allow methods other than OPTIONS to use *?

It's probably jet lag speaking, but was it considered in place of /.well-known/ ?

Received on Saturday, 24 July 2010 19:08:47 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mark Nottingham: "Re: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods?"
Previous message: Julian Reschke: "Re: #122 (MIME-Version not listed in P1, general header fields)"
In reply to: Mark Nottingham: "NEW: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods?"
Next in thread: Mark Nottingham: "Re: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods?"
Reply: Mark Nottingham: "Re: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:22 UTC