ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2010 by author

=JeffH

• re: effective request URI/target URI, issues 221 & 222, was: Issues addressed, by the -10 drafts (Wednesday, 8 September)

Adam Barth

• Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) (Thursday, 30 September)
• Re: Unifying & standardizing X-Moz & X-Purpose headers (Thursday, 23 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: Multiple content-types, was: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: [#232] User-Agent Guidelines (proposal) (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#232] User-Agent Guidelines (proposal) (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Friday, 20 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects [#238] (Friday, 20 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• User confirmation and 307 redirects (Wednesday, 18 August)

Adrien de Croy

• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Tuesday, 10 August)
• Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Friday, 16 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Thursday, 15 July)

Alexey Melnikov

• [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-kitten-digest-to-historic-02.txt] (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Request for feedback on HTTP Streaming overview (draft-wu-http-streaming-optimization-ps) (Wednesday, 4 August)
• Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs (Wednesday, 28 July)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) (Wednesday, 29 September)
• Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) (Wednesday, 29 September)
• Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [#232] User-Agent Guidelines (proposal) (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-01.txt (Monday, 16 August)

Barry Leiba

• Re: Charter revision (Wednesday, 25 August)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Multiple Content-Type headers (was: Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths) (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: parsing of unknown challenges, was: Ticket 237 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: Protocol switch before, or after the 101 response? (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt (Saturday, 11 September)
• Protocol switch before, or after the 101 response? (Saturday, 11 September)

Cyrus Daboo

• Re: Issue 141: "should we have an auth scheme registry" (Tuesday, 28 September)
• Re: Issue 141: "should we have an auth scheme registry" (Wednesday, 15 September)

Dan Winship

• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Thursday, 23 September)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-portal-00.txt (Wednesday, 18 August)

Daniel Stenberg

• RE: http URI grammar (Friday, 6 August)
• Re: Migrating CONNECT and Upgrade details from RFC2817 (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header (Friday, 16 July)
• Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header (Wednesday, 14 July)

Darrel Miller

• POST with empty body (Thursday, 2 September)

David Morris

• Re: POST with empty body (Thursday, 2 September)
• Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] (Thursday, 8 July)

Dirk Pranke

• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Friday, 20 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)

Eran Hammer-Lahav

• Re: I-D Submission: draft-lee-httpext-metadata-00.txt (Sunday, 4 July)

Eric J. Bowman

• Re: Link Relation Registry initial contents (Saturday, 25 September)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-02.txt (Tuesday, 24 August)
• conditional-request implementation feedback (Tuesday, 24 August)

Eric Lawrence

• RE: http URI grammar (Friday, 6 August)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• RE: Migrating CONNECT and Upgrade details from RFC2817 (Thursday, 29 July)

Henrik Nordström

• Re: Protocol switch before, or after the 101 response? (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: Protocol switch before, or after the 101 response? (Saturday, 11 September)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Saturday, 11 September)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt (Monday, 6 September)
• Re: POST with empty body (Sunday, 5 September)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt (Sunday, 5 September)
• Re: conditional-request implementation feedback (Sunday, 5 September)
• Re: remove/deprecate User-Agent header? (Sunday, 5 September)
• Re: New issue: p5-range 5.4.2, proxy recommendations regarding 200 responses to Range (Sunday, 29 August)
• Re: Charter revision (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Issue: expect 100-continue in HTTP/1.0 requests (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Re: proposal for issue #178 (Sunday, 25 July)
• Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header (Friday, 16 July)
• Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: [#193] Trailers and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 July)

IESG Secretary

• WG Action: RECHARTER: Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) (Tuesday, 28 September)
• WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) (Tuesday, 14 September)

IETF Secretariat

• IPR Disclosure: CNRS's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4768, RFC 2069, RFC 4169, and draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-11 (Tuesday, 31 August)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-02.txt (Wednesday, 22 September)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-01.txt (Thursday, 16 September)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt (Saturday, 4 September)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-11.txt (Wednesday, 4 August)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-11.txt (Wednesday, 4 August)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-11.txt (Wednesday, 4 August)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-11.txt (Wednesday, 4 August)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-11.txt (Wednesday, 4 August)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-11.txt (Wednesday, 4 August)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-11.txt (Wednesday, 4 August)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-04.txt (Monday, 12 July)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-10.txt (Monday, 12 July)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-10.txt (Monday, 12 July)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-10.txt (Monday, 12 July)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-10.txt (Monday, 12 July)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-10.txt (Monday, 12 July)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-10.txt (Monday, 12 July)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-10.txt (Monday, 12 July)

J Ross Nicoll

• Re: remove/deprecate User-Agent header? (Thursday, 19 August)

Jan Algermissen

• Re: POST with empty body (Thursday, 2 September)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) (Thursday, 30 September)
• Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) (Wednesday, 29 September)
• Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) (Wednesday, 29 September)
• Re: Issue 141: "should we have an auth scheme registry" (Tuesday, 28 September)
• Re: Issue 141: "should we have an auth scheme registry" (Tuesday, 28 September)
• Re: Link Relation Registry initial contents (Saturday, 25 September)
• Re: Link Relation Registry initial contents (Friday, 24 September)
• Multiple content-types, was: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [#177] Realm required on challenges (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [#177] Realm required on challenges (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: parsing of unknown challenges, was: Ticket 237 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• parsing of unknown challenges, was: Ticket 237 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#232] User-Agent Guidelines (proposal) (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) (Sunday, 19 September)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-01.txt (Thursday, 16 September)
• ticket #78 (Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate) (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: Issue 141: "should we have an auth scheme registry" (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: [#177] Realm required on challenges (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Issue 141: "should we have an auth scheme registry" (Monday, 13 September)
• Issue 195, was: Proposed RFC 2617 erratum, Re: Backwards definition of authentication header (Monday, 13 September)
• Re: Ticket 237 (absorbing more of 2617), was: Minutes for Maastricht (Monday, 13 September)
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt (Sunday, 12 September)
• Re: effective request URI/target URI, issues 221 & 222, was: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts (Monday, 6 September)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt (Monday, 6 September)
• Issue 123 (factor out Content-Disposition), was: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt (Saturday, 4 September)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-00.txt (Saturday, 4 September)
• Re: IPR Disclosure: CNRS's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4768, RFC 2069, RFC 4169, and draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-11 (Wednesday, 1 September)
• Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-03.txt (Tuesday, 31 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Friday, 27 August)
• Re: Charter revision (Friday, 27 August)
• Issue 241 conditional header eval order, was: conditional-request implementation feedback (Thursday, 26 August)
• Re: Charter revision (Thursday, 26 August)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-02.txt (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-02.txt (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-02.txt (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Friday, 20 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: remove/deprecate User-Agent header? (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: remove/deprecate User-Agent header? (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-01.txt (Monday, 16 August)
• Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-01.txt (Monday, 16 August)
• Fwd: RFC 5987 on Character Set and Language Encoding for Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Header Field Parameters (Friday, 13 August)
• Fwd: Proposal for work on an efficient, browser-friendly, HTTP-based communication protocol for fine-grained information exchange (Thursday, 12 August)
• Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: Ticket 237 (absorbing more of 2617), was: Minutes for Maastricht (Tuesday, 10 August)
• HTTPbis -11 drafts published (Wednesday, 4 August)
• Re: Ticket 237 (absorbing more of 2617), was: Minutes for Maastricht (Thursday, 29 July)
• Ticket 237 (absorbing more of 2617), was: Minutes for Maastricht (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Reminder: HTTPbis WG meeting today (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: #122 (MIME-Version not listed in P1, general header fields) (Saturday, 24 July)
• Re: [#203] Max-forwards and extension methods (Saturday, 24 July)
• Issue 208, was: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts (Friday, 23 July)
• Issue 39, was: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts (Friday, 23 July)
• issue 226, "proxies not supporting certain methods" (Friday, 23 July)
• effective request URI/target URI, issues 221 & 222, was: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts (Friday, 23 July)
• Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: Revised Maastricht Agenda (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication (Monday, 19 July)
• Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication (Monday, 19 July)
• Re: [#193] Trailers and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 July)
• parsing decimals, was: HTTPbis -10 drafts published (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: DRAFT HTTPbis agenda for Maastricht (Tuesday, 13 July)
• HTTPbis -10 drafts published (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] (Thursday, 8 July)

Kris Zyp

• Re: Fwd: Proposal for work on an efficient, browser-friendly, HTTP-based communication protocol for fine-grained information exchange (Thursday, 12 August)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Friday, 20 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Friday, 20 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)

Mark Baker

• Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs (Wednesday, 28 July)

Mark Nottingham

• IANA hanges to draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Thursday, 23 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [#177] Realm required on challenges (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#232] User-Agent Guidelines (proposal) (Monday, 20 September)
• [#232] User-Agent Guidelines (proposal) (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts (Tuesday, 14 September)
• No WG meeting at IETF 79 (Monday, 13 September)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 8 September)
• Re: effective request URI/target URI, issues 221 & 222, was: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-03.txt [ new WG item ] (Friday, 3 September)
• Re: POST with empty body (Friday, 3 September)
• Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts (Thursday, 2 September)
• Re: New issue: p5-range 5.4.2, proxy recommendations regarding 200 responses to Range (Thursday, 2 September)
• Re: IPR Disclosure: CNRS's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4768, RFC 2069, RFC 4169, and draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-11 (Wednesday, 1 September)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Tuesday, 31 August)
• Charter revision (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects [#238] (Friday, 20 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects [#238] (Friday, 20 August)
• Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-portal-01.txt (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-portal-00.txt (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: RFC 5987 on Character Set and Language Encoding for Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Header Field Parameters (Friday, 13 August)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Tuesday, 10 August)
• Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-portal-00.txt (Thursday, 5 August)
• Re: NEW: #225: PUT and DELETE invalidation vs. staleness (Tuesday, 3 August)
• Re: issue 79: must understand content-* header fields or fail (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs (Thursday, 29 July)
• Migrating CONNECT and Upgrade details from RFC2817 (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: NEW: #225: PUT and DELETE invalidation vs. staleness (Thursday, 29 July)
• Minutes for Maastricht (Tuesday, 27 July)
• Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: Revised Maastricht Agenda (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods? (Sunday, 25 July)
• NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses (Saturday, 24 July)
• Forcing validation (Saturday, 24 July)
• NEW: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods? (Saturday, 24 July)
• NEW: #224 - Header Classifications (Friday, 23 July)
• NEW: #223: Allowing heuristic freshness for new status codes (Friday, 23 July)
• NEW: #225: PUT and DELETE invalidation vs. staleness (Friday, 23 July)
• A note about the issues list and editorial workflow (Friday, 23 July)
• Re: Revised Maastricht Agenda (Friday, 23 July)
• Issues addressed by the -10 drafts (Thursday, 22 July)
• Revised Maastricht Agenda (Monday, 19 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: parsing decimals, was: HTTPbis -10 drafts published (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: issue 79: must understand content-* header fields or fail (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published (Wednesday, 14 July)
• [#203] Max-forwards and extension methods (Wednesday, 14 July)
• [#193] Trailers and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: [#208] IANA registry for cache-control directives (Wednesday, 14 July)
• DRAFT HTTPbis agenda for Maastricht (Monday, 12 July)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] (Wednesday, 7 July)
• Re: Questions (errata?) about caching authenticated responses [#174] (Thursday, 1 July)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt (Thursday, 1 July)

Mark Pauley

• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs (Wednesday, 28 July)

Moore, Jonathan

• Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses (Sunday, 25 July)

Nathan

• Link Relation Registry initial contents (Thursday, 23 September)
• how to handle "Not Yet Available"? (Thursday, 16 September)
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: POST with empty body (Friday, 3 September)
• Scope of body in an OPTIONS response (Thursday, 12 August)

Patrick McManus

• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Tuesday, 31 August)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Monday, 23 August)

Paul Leach

• RE: IPR Disclosure: CNRS's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4768, RFC 2069, RFC 4169, and draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-11 (Wednesday, 1 September)

Paul Wise

• Re: remove/deprecate User-Agent header? (Thursday, 19 August)
• remove/deprecate User-Agent header? (Thursday, 19 August)

Peter Pöml

• Re: draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-18.txt (Saturday, 25 September)

Reto Bachmann-Gmür

• Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs (Wednesday, 28 July)

Robert Collins

• Re: IPR Disclosure: CNRS's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4768, RFC 2069, RFC 4169, and draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-11 (Wednesday, 1 September)

Robert Sayre

• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Wednesday, 18 August)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Unifying & standardizing X-Moz & X-Purpose headers (Thursday, 23 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Friday, 20 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: rewritten section on message body and length (Tuesday, 10 August)
• Re: http URI grammar (Friday, 6 August)
• sending Last-Modified in 304 and 206 responses (Wednesday, 28 July)
• rewritten section on Content-Location (Wednesday, 28 July)
• rewritten section on message body and length (Wednesday, 28 July)
• disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: effective request URI/target URI, issues 221 & 222, was: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts (Friday, 23 July)
• Re: Issues addressed by the -10 drafts (Thursday, 22 July)
• Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication (Tuesday, 20 July)
• Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication (Monday, 19 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Friday, 16 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] (Wednesday, 7 July)

Salvatore Loreto

• Re: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt (Friday, 9 July)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-portal-00.txt (Thursday, 5 August)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: parsing of unknown challenges, was: Ticket 237 (Wednesday, 22 September)

Thomson, Martin

• 403 description clarifications (Wednesday, 29 September)
• RE: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• RE: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• RE: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• RE: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• RE: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Tuesday, 10 August)
• RE: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods? (Sunday, 25 July)
• RE: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods? (Saturday, 24 July)
• RE: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Friday, 16 July)
• RE: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt (Friday, 9 July)
• RE: I-D Action:draft-loreto-http-timeout-00.txt (Friday, 2 July)

Wenbo Zhu

• Re: Proposal for work on an efficient, browser-friendly, HTTP-based communication protocol for fine-grained information exchange (Friday, 13 August)

William A. Rowe Jr.

• Specific non-2616 MS RFC implementation (Thursday, 23 September)
• Re: Charter revision (Thursday, 26 August)
• Re: Charter revision (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Re: disallowing userinfo in http and https URIs (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication (Monday, 19 July)

Willy Tarreau

• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 8 September)
• Re: POST with empty body (Thursday, 2 September)
• Re: Issues addressed in the -10 and -11 drafts (Thursday, 2 September)
• Re: remove/deprecate User-Agent header? (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Tuesday, 10 August)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-00.txt (Tuesday, 10 August)
• Re: Migrating CONNECT and Upgrade details from RFC2817 (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: rewritten section on message body and length (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: NEW: #233 - Is * usable as a request-uri for new methods? (Saturday, 24 July)
• Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: Issue 146, was: Users with different access rights in HTTP Authentication (Monday, 19 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Friday, 16 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Friday, 16 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: parsing decimals, was: HTTPbis -10 drafts published (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published : Connection header (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: HTTPbis -10 drafts published (Wednesday, 14 July)
• Re: httpbis-p2 : 1xx messages may not always be treated as 100 (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] (Thursday, 8 July)
• httpbis-p2 : 1xx messages may not always be treated as 100 (Tuesday, 6 July)

Yves Lafon

• Re: New issue: p5-range 5.4.2, proxy recommendations regarding 200 responses to Range (Monday, 20 September)
• Re: User confirmation and 307 redirects (Thursday, 19 August)
• http URI grammar (Wednesday, 4 August)
• Re: NEW: #225: PUT and DELETE invalidation vs. staleness (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: NEW: #225: PUT and DELETE invalidation vs. staleness (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: NEW: #235: Cache Invalidation only happens upon successful responses (Monday, 26 July)
• Re: New issue: p5-range 5.4.2, proxy recommendations regarding 200 responses to Range (Friday, 23 July)
• Re: proposal for issue #178 (Friday, 23 July)
• Re: httpbis-p2 : 1xx messages may not always be treated as 100 (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: NEW: value space of status codes [#213] (Thursday, 8 July)

蓋文彼德斯

• Unifying & standardizing X-Moz & X-Purpose headers (Thursday, 23 September)

陈智昌

• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: [#95] Multiple Content-Lengths (Tuesday, 21 September)

이문상

• RE: I-D Submission: draft-lee-httpext-metadata-00.txt (Tuesday, 6 July)
• RE: I-D Submission: draft-lee-httpext-metadata-00.txt (Sunday, 4 July)
• RE: I-D Submission: draft-lee-httpext-metadata-00.txt (Sunday, 4 July)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 September 2010 07:47:39 UTC