Re: Link Relation Registry initial contents

On 25.09.2010 05:48, Eric J. Bowman wrote:
> Is omitting rel='transformation' an oversight?
>
> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#grddl-xhtml

GRDDL predates this registry, and the HTML WG hasn't yet decided to use 
this registry.

> Or is there a reason it can't be a Link header?

I think it could be used in a link header, but I'd propose to give it a 
more specific name then.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Saturday, 25 September 2010 06:46:37 UTC