Re: [#193] Trailers and intermediaries

On 14.07.2010 07:14, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Henrik,
> I think a bit more of a change is necessary to get this right;
>> b) the trailer fields consist entirely of optional metadata, and the recipient could use the message (in a manner acceptable to the server where the field originated) without receiving it. In other words, the server that generated the header (often but not always the origin server) is willing to accept the possibility that the trailer fields might be silently discarded along the path to the client.
> Thoughts?

Sounds good. Proposed patch: 

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 11:42:31 UTC