Re: Charter revision

On 26.08.2010 22:51, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 8/26/2010 2:26 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> Finally: why do you think this is not a good time?
>
> Didn't mean to imply the timing for merging 2616/2617 was wrong.  I was only
> asking if STD tracking was appropriate now.

I see.

 From a pragmatic point of view, I don't think that many consumers of 
the spec care a lot about the standards level.

 From an IETF point of view, I really would like to be able to advance 
it. But I wouldn't be surprised if the IESG sees that differently, given 
the amount of reorganization, and also current discussion about revising 
the standards levels.

Best regards, Julian