On 19.08.2010 13:58, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:16:58 +0200, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> On 19.08.2010 11:54, Yves Lafon wrote: >>> ... >>> Only for non-safe operations, and it was already the case for 301 in >>> 2616. Also "harmful to interoperability" is an untestable claim. >>> ... >> >> Which reminds me that the much more serious interop problems for 307 >> redirects on POST is that Safari is rewriting the message to GET. I >> know this problem has been reported to Apple over two years ago... > > If you do not want to show UI or inform the user of something most users > cannot comprehend and you do not want to do something "dangerous" it > seems somewhat okayish to issue a GET instead. Yes, but in that case 307 is the wrong status code; use 303 instead. Best regards, JulianReceived on Thursday, 19 August 2010 12:10:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 1 February 2023 02:17:43 UTC