Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods) from Anne van Kesteren on 2010-09-22 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2010)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:55:11 +0200
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vjgcd8qm64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:50:52 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> We cab *allow* it for certain methods, but why allow it for more methods  
> than it's needed for?

Because it is more consistent and will encourage people to use that what  
actually works everywhere and for every method (if they really want that  
behavior).

-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2010 20:55:48 UTC