- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:06:46 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
This sounds like a great idea. Henrik -----Original Message----- From: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mark Nottingham Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 3:17 AM To: HTTP Working Group Subject: Migrating CONNECT and Upgrade details from RFC2817 In Maastricht, we discussed moving selected parts of RFC2817 into HTTPbis; specifically CONNECT - http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/239 Upgrade - http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/240 Alexey stated we don't need to have a charter change for this, since we'll be elaborating what is (poorly) defined in 2616 using current practice. It's also likely that this will result in 2817 being moved to historic status, since no one uses it as a framework (i.e., they just use CONNECT and perhaps Upgrade separately, in other ways). Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2010 12:07:22 UTC