- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:13:20 +1000
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
I was thinking maybe a note in p1 request-target's description, as well as appropriate adjustments elsewhere in p1. I've opened http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/218 On 14/07/2010, at 5:10 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > >> Since we're going on this tangent - >> >> Is this (proxying other URI schemes through HTTP) worth making a little more explicit? The question of whether non-HTTP URI schemes are allowed in HTTP comes up from time to time. Other issues (e.g., what to do with the Host header) come up as well. > > We could add something to the discussion on URIs in p1 > or maybe add a dedicated section in p2. > > ....Roy > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 07:13:53 UTC