- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 08:00:09 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:29:53PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: > p1-messaging > #90 - Delimiting messages with multipart/byteranges (-11) Good point it went away. I too am an author of an implementation that does not support it. > #95 - Handling multiple Content-Length headers (-11) I reported a few cases of duplicated content-lengths I already observed and the fact that I decided to only allow multiple content-lengths if they are all exactly the same. You said that for this specific case this was probably acceptable. Do you think relaxing the rule for this specific case merits a a small add-on to the spec or should we simply enfore the test and wait for code responsible for duplication to get fixed when facing the errors (after all, since the content-length is not defined as a comma-separated list, it should never appear more than once, but you know the difference between what we say and what we observe) ? Thanks, Willy
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:00:41 UTC