- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:40:22 +0200
- To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
OPTIONS * or [other method] * ? OPTIONS * was definitely considered, but it's got implementation problems (while technically possible, it's difficult for average folks to affect the response) and OPTIONS isn't cacheable. Cheers, On 24/07/2010, at 9:10 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote: >> Anyone think we should allow methods other than OPTIONS to use *? > > It's probably jet lag speaking, but was it considered in place of /.well-known/ ? > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 25 July 2010 07:40:52 UTC