Re: Issue 160 (Redirects and non-GET methods)

On 22.09.2010 22:42, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:13:08 +0200, Julian Reschke
> <> wrote:
>> My proposal is to say SHOULD NOT change the method, except for GET
>> which can be changed to POST for compatibility with broken web content
>> (which should use 303 instead).
> If we make 307 the new 301/302 I'd rather we rewrite for all methods
> consistently rather than just for POST.

We can't mandate that; it would break existing non-browser uses.

We cab *allow* it for certain methods, but why allow it for more methods 
than it's needed for?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2010 20:51:31 UTC