- From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:52:38 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Is this (proxying other URI schemes through HTTP) worth making a little more > explicit? The question of whether non-HTTP URI schemes are allowed in HTTP > comes up from time to time. Other issues (e.g., what to do with the Host > header) come up as well. As author of a tool that sends all sorts of URIs over HTTP proxies, I must say that it would help to get the (lack of) documented support better detailed. -- / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 15:53:12 UTC