- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 23:20:43 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hi, In http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-11 on the Upgrade header, "The capabilities and nature of the application- layer communication after the protocol change is entirely dependent upon the new protocol chosen, although the first action after changing the protocol MUST be a response to the initial HTTP request containing the Upgrade header field." In http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-11 in definition of the 101 status code this seems to be contradicted, "The server will switch protocols to those defined by the response's Upgrade header field immediately after the empty line which terminates the 101 response." One says you switch and then send the 101, the other says you send the 101 and then switch. (There is also a singular/plural mismatch, but that is probably no problem here). (I noticed this when wondering what happens to pipelined requests that succeed a request to switch protocols if the server decides to switch.) regards, -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Saturday, 11 September 2010 21:21:23 UTC