- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:10:05 -0700
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Since we're going on this tangent - > > Is this (proxying other URI schemes through HTTP) worth making a little more explicit? The question of whether non-HTTP URI schemes are allowed in HTTP comes up from time to time. Other issues (e.g., what to do with the Host header) come up as well. We could add something to the discussion on URIs in p1 or maybe add a dedicated section in p2. ....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 07:10:33 UTC