- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:01:39 +1000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Willy, On 14/07/2010, at 4:50 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi, > >> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-10#appendix-C.11> > > This one is still rather vague about the CONNECT method (7.9). > It says : > > This specification reserves the method name CONNECT for use with a > proxy that can dynamically switch to being a tunnel (e.g., SSL > tunneling [RFC2817]). I was just looking at a couple of bookmarked e-mails regarding CONNECT, and thinking that taking responsibility for it from 2817 is something we should discuss in Maastricht; we already update it for other reasons, and several people have complained about this over the years. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 07:02:12 UTC