ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2007 by date

Saturday, 31 March 2007

• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrian Chadd

Friday, 30 March 2007

• Section 13 Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 28 March 2007

• RE: pipelined client/server behaviour Eric Lawrence
• pipelined client/server behaviour Adrian Chadd

Sunday, 25 March 2007

• RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Henrik Nordstrom
• RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Henrik Nordstrom

Saturday, 24 March 2007

• HTTP Vocabulary in RDF Julian Reschke

Friday, 23 March 2007

• RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Scott Lawrence
• RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Eric Lawrence
• RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Eric Lawrence

Tuesday, 20 March 2007

• proposed mods to draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt Adrien de Croy
• Re: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Thought on ABNF upgrade Henrik Nordstrom

Saturday, 17 March 2007

• Re: Thought on ABNF upgrade Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Alexey Melnikov
• Thought on ABNF upgrade Julian Reschke

Friday, 16 March 2007

• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Henrik Nordstrom

Thursday, 15 March 2007

• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? David Morris
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Adrien de Croy
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Adrien de Croy
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Nicholas Shanks
• RE: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Larry Masinter
• RE: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Eric Lawrence
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Mark Nottingham
• RE: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Eric Lawrence
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Stefan Eissing
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Mark Nottingham
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Mark Baker
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Joe Orton
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Stefan Eissing
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Mark Nottingham
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Thomas Roessler
• New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Mark Nottingham

Monday, 12 March 2007

• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Asbjørn Ulsberg

Saturday, 10 March 2007

• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Mike Schinkel

Friday, 9 March 2007

• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Mike Schinkel
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Eric Lawrence
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Roy T. Fielding
• Programa de Intercambio Clínico: Presente sus Casos Críticos a sus Colegas Junta Médica Virtual

Thursday, 8 March 2007

• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Adrien de Croy
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Henrik Nordstrom
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET David Morris
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Julian Reschke
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Mike Schinkel
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Eric Lawrence
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET David Morris
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET David Morris
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Eric Lawrence
• RE: Straw-man charter Larry Masinter
• Re: Straw-man charter Mark Nottingham
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Julian Reschke
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Adrien de Croy
• Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Julian Reschke
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Adrien de Croy
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Straw-man charter Robert Sayre
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Julian Reschke
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Mike Schinkel
• RE: HTTP Request Forwarding? Mike Schinkel
• Re: HTTP Request Forwarding? Travis Snoozy
• RE: HTTP Request Forwarding? Mike Schinkel
• Re: HTTP Request Forwarding? Adrien de Croy
• HTTP Request Forwarding? Mike Schinkel
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Adrien de Croy
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Mike Schinkel
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Adrien de Croy
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Eric Lawrence

Wednesday, 7 March 2007

• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Straw-man charter Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Removing Content-Location Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 6 March 2007

• Re: Straw-man charter Justin Erenkrantz
• Re: products in Server header field Justin Erenkrantz
• Re: Straw-man charter Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Straw-man charter Mark Nottingham
• Re: Straw-man charter Mark Nottingham
• Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke
• Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke
• Re: Straw-man charter Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Straw-man charter Larry Masinter
• Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke
• Re: Straw-man charter Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke
• Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke
• Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke
• Re: Straw-man charter Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Straw-man charter Mark Nottingham
• Re: Informal get-together in Prague - Details Mark Nottingham

Monday, 5 March 2007

• Informal get-together in Prague - Details Mark Nottingham

Friday, 2 March 2007

• Re: products in Server header field David Morris
• Re: products in Server header field Henrik Nordstrom

Thursday, 1 March 2007

• products in Server header field Nicolas Krebs

Wednesday, 28 February 2007

• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-pettersen-cache-context-00.txt Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)

Saturday, 24 February 2007

• RE: Link Header draft Mike Schinkel

Wednesday, 21 February 2007

• Re: Link Header draft Mark Nottingham
• Re: Fwd: [Standards-discuss] [HTML in email] Keith Moore
• Re: Fwd: [Standards-discuss] [HTML in email] Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Fwd: [Standards-discuss] [HTML in email] Keith Moore

Tuesday, 20 February 2007

• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-stale-while-revalidate-00.txt Mark Nottingham
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-00.txt Mark Nottingham

Monday, 19 February 2007

• Fwd: [Standards-discuss] [HTML in email] Lisa Dusseault

Sunday, 18 February 2007

• Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 Julian Reschke
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 Julian Reschke
• [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 Henrik Nordstrom

Saturday, 17 February 2007

• HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Julian Reschke
• Re: Link Header draft Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Link Header draft Mike Schinkel

Friday, 16 February 2007

• Re: Link Header draft Joe Gregorio
• Re: Link Header draft Ian Hickson
• Re: Link Header draft Julian Reschke
• Re: Link Header draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Link Header draft Mark Nottingham
• Re: Link Header draft Julian Reschke
• Re: Link Header draft Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 15 February 2007

• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom

Wednesday, 14 February 2007

• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Jamie Lokier
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Jamie Lokier
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom

Tuesday, 13 February 2007

• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Link Header draft Ian Hickson
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Jamie Lokier
• Call for Submissions: ICIMP 2007 & ICDT 2007 & ICGD&BC 2007, Silicon Valley, July 1-6, 2007 Dr. Reda
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy

Monday, 12 February 2007

• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy
• RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
• RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy
• Re: Link Header draft Stefan Eissing
• Re: Link Header draft Julian Reschke
• Re: Link Header draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Link Header draft Stefan Eissing
• Re: Link Header draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Link Header draft Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 11 February 2007

• Re: Extension to HTTP : TimeZone David Thielen
• Re: http-link-header in GRDDL Harry Halpin

Saturday, 10 February 2007

• Re: Link Header draft Mark Nottingham
• Re: Updating Entity Headers with 304s Mark Nottingham
• Re: Updating Entity Headers with 304s Mark Nottingham
• Re: Updating Entity Headers with 304s Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Updating Entity Headers with 304s Roy T. Fielding
• Updating Entity Headers with 304s Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 8 February 2007

• http-link-header in GRDDL Danny Ayers

Wednesday, 7 February 2007

• Informal get-together in Prague Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 6 February 2007

• Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Asbjørn Ulsberg

Sunday, 4 February 2007

• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy
• RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom
• RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] S. Mike Dierken
• Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom

Saturday, 3 February 2007

• Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Roy T. Fielding
• Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Julian Reschke

Friday, 2 February 2007

• Re: etag vs if-* vs range vs content-encoding? Henrik Nordstrom
• [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Julian Reschke

Thursday, 1 February 2007

• etag vs if-* vs range vs content-encoding? PA

Monday, 29 January 2007

• Re: Link Header draft Roy T. Fielding

Sunday, 28 January 2007

• Re: Link Header draft Mark Nottingham
• Re: Link Header draft Julian Reschke
• Link Header draft Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 24 January 2007

• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Julian Reschke
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Roy T. Fielding
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Julian Reschke
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Roy T. Fielding
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Julian Reschke
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Henrik Nordstrom

Tuesday, 23 January 2007

• NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Julian Reschke

Monday, 22 January 2007

• Re: 3.2.2 issue Mark Baker
• Re: 3.2.2 issue Henrik Nordstrom
• 3.2.2 issue Mark Baker

Friday, 19 January 2007

• Re: Message delimiting security issues William A. Rowe, Jr.
• Re: Message delimiting security issues Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Message delimiting security issues Larry Masinter

Thursday, 18 January 2007

• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Jamie Lokier
• Re: Message delimiting security issues lists@ingostruck.de
• Re: Message delimiting security issues Henrik Nordstrom

Wednesday, 17 January 2007

• Re: Message delimiting security issues William A. Rowe, Jr.
• Re: Message delimiting security issues Julian Reschke
• Re: Message delimiting security issues Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Message delimiting security issues Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Message delimiting security issues Travis Snoozy
• Re: Message delimiting security issues Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Message delimiting security issues Travis Snoozy
• Re: Message delimiting security issues William A. Rowe, Jr.
• Re: Message delimiting security issues Julian Reschke
• Re: Message delimiting security issues Travis Snoozy
• Message delimiting security issues Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements Yves Lafon
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Yves Lafon
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Mark Nottingham
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests William A. Rowe, Jr.
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Roy T. Fielding
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests William A. Rowe, Jr.
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 16 January 2007

• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Roy T. Fielding
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Mark Nottingham
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Jamie Lokier
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Henrik Nordstrom
• Reminder: Comments on Domain Structure and cookie drafts requested Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Scott Lawrence
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests William A. Rowe, Jr.
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Henrik Nordstrom

Monday, 15 January 2007

• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Mark Nottingham
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Roy T. Fielding
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Scott Lawrence
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Mark Baker
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests William A. Rowe, Jr.
• i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Mark Nottingham

Friday, 12 January 2007

• Re: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements Henrik Nordstrom
• Re: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea David Morris
• RE: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea Larry Masinter
• Re: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea Mike Dierken

Thursday, 11 January 2007

• Re: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea Nicholas Shanks
• Re: New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements Lisa Dusseault
• Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea David Morris
• RE: HTTP idea Larry Masinter
• Re: HTTP idea Jamie Lokier
• New issue: 6.1.1 can on a quick reading be misread that it's a complete list of status codes Henrik Nordstrom
• New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements Henrik Nordstrom
• RE: HTTP idea Joris Dobbelsteen
• HTTP idea Nicholas Shanks

Wednesday, 10 January 2007

• Re: Large content size value Jamie Lokier

Monday, 8 January 2007

• Warning and Date Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt)

Saturday, 6 January 2007

• Re: Large content size value Jamie Lokier
• Re: Large content size value William A. Rowe, Jr.

Friday, 5 January 2007

• RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• Re: Large content size value William A. Rowe, Jr.
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• RE: Large content size value Scott Lawrence
• RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• RE: Large content size value Henrik Nordstrom
• RE: Large content size value Larry Masinter
• RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• NEW ISSUE: updating from RFC2048 to RFC4288 Julian Reschke
• RE: Large content size value Henrik Nordstrom
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Paul Leach
• RE: Large content size value David Morris
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Paul Leach
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Paul Leach
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 William A. Rowe, Jr.

Thursday, 4 January 2007

• RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• Re: Large content size value Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Large content size value Joris Dobbelsteen
• RE: Large content size value Larry Masinter
• RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 William A. Rowe, Jr.
• RE: Large content size value Paul Leach
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 William A. Rowe, Jr.
• RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Paul Leach
• NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• Re: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) Mark Baker
• Re: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Mark Nottingham
• RE: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) Henrik Nordstrom

Wednesday, 3 January 2007

• RE: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) Paul Leach
• Re: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) Henrik Nordstrom
• Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 2 January 2007

• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Paul Leach
• Re: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Mike Whitehurst
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Paul Leach
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Larry Masinter
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Paul Leach
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes William A. Rowe, Jr.
• RE: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• RE: Allow is not in 13.5.2 Travis Snoozy (Volt)
• OT: Effective Spec Writing [was RE: Large content size value] Travis Snoozy (Volt)

Monday, 1 January 2007

• Re: NEW ISSUE: Sort 1.3 Terminology Mark Nottingham
• Re: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Mark Nottingham
• Re: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Mark Nottingham
• Re: Allow is not in 13.5.2 Mark Nottingham
• Re: NEW ISSUE: editorial bug in 13.5.1 Mark Nottingham
• Re: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Mark Nottingham

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2007 16:51:37 UTC