- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:57:03 +0100
- To: "Stefan Eissing" <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, "Nottingham Mark" <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:56:31 +0100, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de> wrote: >> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:58:35 +0100, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> >> wrote: >>> Oh - and there's also already an Atom link relations IANA registry, so >>> it would require a certain amount of coordination. >>> >>> What do others think? Should there be a single, flat link relation >>> registry? >> >> http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions > > It makes sense to keep a list at a known, stable location, which then > references the defining documents/standards. Isn't that exactly what the link above does? (It's not entirely clear to me, as you don't elaborate much on "known", "stable location" etc.) > Making a FCFS IANA as in http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-parameters > would work, although it looks a bit twentycentury. One idea Ian Hickson had would be to set up a web service somewhere on whatwg.org which people could use to add new values, which validators could use to update their list, etc. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 12 February 2007 15:57:57 UTC