- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:47:35 -0400
- To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sounds more like a 3xx, perhaps even 303? The hard part is getting these proxies to support it, of course. Mark. On 3/15/07, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > After being in hotels for a few weeks, I'm starting to wonder whether > a new 2xx HTTP status code could be defined whose semantic is "This > isn't what you asked for, but here's some information about how to > get network access so you can eventually get it." > > 2xx so that browsers will display it. AFAICT, they do; or at least, > Safari and Firefox do (see <http://www.mnot.net/test/222.asis>). IE? > 4xx might be more appropriate, but I despair of "friendly" error > messages. (thought they could be padded, I suppose). > > A new status code so that feed aggregators, automated clients, etc. > can differentiate what they asked for from your hotel / conference > centre / etc. asking for cash in order to get network access, and not > get horribly messed up as a result. > > It would also be useful in those cases where you get redirected > somewhere to login and get a cookie for authentication; e.g., Yahoo!, > Google, Amazon, etc. Same situation, but slightly different use case. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > >
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 14:47:42 UTC