- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:10:10 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, Nottingham Mark <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren schrieb: > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:56:31 +0100, Stefan Eissing > <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de> wrote: >>> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:58:35 +0100, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> >>> wrote: >>>> Oh - and there's also already an Atom link relations IANA registry, >>>> so it would require a certain amount of coordination. >>>> >>>> What do others think? Should there be a single, flat link relation >>>> registry? >>> >>> http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions >> >> It makes sense to keep a list at a known, stable location, which then >> references the defining documents/standards. > > Isn't that exactly what the link above does? (It's not entirely clear to > me, as you don't elaborate much on "known", "stable location" etc.) > ... I would be extremely surprised if the IESG would let us define a registry which is not maintained by IANA. We may get away with no registry at all, or a registry for short names, and allowing URIs in addition, though. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 12 February 2007 16:10:13 UTC