Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel?

* Mark Nottingham wrote:
>2xx so that browsers will display it. AFAICT, they do; or at least,  
>Safari and Firefox do (see <http://www.mnot.net/test/222.asis>). IE?  
>4xx might be more appropriate, but I despair of "friendly" error  
>messages. (thought they could be padded, I suppose).

We have 402 and well-known workarounds for "friendly" error messages?

>It would also be useful in those cases where you get redirected  
>somewhere to login and get a cookie for authentication; e.g., Yahoo!,  
>Google, Amazon, etc. Same situation, but slightly different use case.

I don't multi-redirect login schemes merit further support.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 14:13:47 UTC