- From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:57:30 +0100
- To: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1168574250.29785.23.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
tor 2007-01-11 klockan 18:30 -0800 skrev David Morris: > Hard to generalize from extensive case by case examination, but Google is > the only site I've observed which uses gzip. Over the past several years > I've spent a lot of time measuring page load timing for well and not so > well known sites and not observed use of gzip. google is far from alone in using gzip. dynamic "content-encoding: gzip" appears to be spreading quite rapidly over the Internet, largely because it's trivial to configure in most web servers these days. I don't have any readily available statistics, but it looks like it's a fairly significant percentage of the web sites using this today. Now if they only did it correctly and not as if "content-encoding" was "transfer-encoding". But we already been in that discussion.. but on the good side at least some vendors start to recognize that on-the-fly gzip is really best done as transfer-encoding and not content-encoding.. But related to this discussion I expect to have quite interesting statistics wrt HTTP header compression in a few weeks. I'll take a note to return with this data. Regards Henrik
Received on Friday, 12 January 2007 03:57:42 UTC