Re: Link Header draft

On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Oh - and there's also already an Atom link relations IANA registry, so 
> it would require a certain amount of coordination.
> What do others think? Should there be a single, flat link relation 
> registry?

The previous spec just deferred to HTML4 for its definitions, do we want 
to not do that here? It seems like it would be dangerous to invent a third 
namespace (especially one that overlaps with existing ones), especially 
for a feature used as rarely as this one.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 20:27:54 UTC