- From: Joris Dobbelsteen <Joris@familiedobbelsteen.nl>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:54:27 +0100
- To: "Travis Snoozy \(Volt\)" <a-travis@microsoft.com>, "Paul Leach" <paulle@windows.microsoft.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
>-----Original Message----- >From: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org >[mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Travis Snoozy (Volt) >Sent: donderdag 4 januari 2007 23:01 >To: Paul Leach; Roy T. Fielding >Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org >Subject: RE: Large content size value > >Deja vous; you forgot the client again (behavior is unspec'd). [snip] So you have seriously compelling reasons to have this spec'd? I'm quite interested. My imagination leaves me behind at this moment. But then again why not spec all potential problems that can occur? Why not: it way beyond our capacity to handle... Why not: the desired behaviours for such situation can be close to infinite. You pointed one... Ask 100 people and you will get several answers. Pose the same question slightly different and you will end up with 100 different answers. - Joris
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2007 22:53:48 UTC