- From: Travis Snoozy (Volt) <a-travis@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:49:47 -0800
- To: Paul Leach <paulle@windows.microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Paul Leach said: > Maybe I wasn't clear -- the reason no one would do anything to their code > if we made the change is not that I believe they don't care about HTTP/1.1 > conformance, its that they already are compliant with the suggested new > wording (because the old wording made the intent clear enough). I understood what you meant. However, it seems that I was unclear: despite the fact that these implementations are doing what is *right*, they aren't doing what is *spec'd*. In this case, the spec needs to change so that these people are in conformance instead of violation (hence my comment that "nobody cares about conformance" -- they'd rather do what's right than be broken-as-spec'd). <snip> Thanks, -- Travis
Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 21:50:03 UTC