- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:50:39 +0100
- To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Scott Lawrence <scott@skrb.org>, "Roy T.Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Travis Snoozy schrieb: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:47:33AM +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > <snip> >> Does the implied LWS rule apply to header names, even if it's not >> allowed in MIME? Allowing LWS around the header name does not make >> sense, but it is not explicitly forbidden. > > LWS is not allowed. > > <snip> >> Content-Length : 100 > > BNF makes it clear. > > token = 1*<any CHAR except CTLs or separators> > message-header = field-name ":" [ field-value ] > field-name = token > separator = [...] | SP | HT > ... Are you aware of the "implied LWS" rule? (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html#rfc.section.2.1.p.11>). Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:50:50 UTC