- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:25:43 +1100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Ah, interesting; I may have spoken too soon. While the Link *header*
defined rel in RFC2068 as an sgml-name;
relationship = sgml-name
| ( <"> sgml-name *( SP sgml-name) <"> )
(section 19.6.2.4)
HTML4 itself defines it thus;
<!ENTITY % LinkTypes "CDATA"
-- space-separated list of link types
-->
<http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/sgml/dtd.html#LinkTypes>
On 2007/02/16, at 10:19 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Mark Nottingham schrieb:
>> ...
>> 1) The syntax of HTML relations are sgml-names (e.g., foo.bar-
>> baz); Atom allows an IRI's isegment-nz-nc (in the spec; in the
>> schema it's an NCName) *or* an IRI.
>> ...
>
> Does HTML4 actually define the syntax somewhere? I was just looking
> at the spec and couldn't find it...
>
> Best regards, Julian
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 16 February 2007 11:25:56 UTC