- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:35:09 +0100
- To: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2007 10:35:57 UTC
tor 2007-03-08 klockan 03:32 -0500 skrev Mike Schinkel: > Does HTTP support POST redirect? I thought it did not. It does. In several forms. We have a) The original 301/302 redirects, which was meant to tell the user agent that the resource has moved and the sane request should be retried at the new location. However, almost everyone (if not all) implements it wrongly using a GET request instead. b) To solve this RFC2616 adds the 303/307 redirects, where 303 SHOULD result in a GET and a 307 SHOULD result in a POST (or whatever method was used for the first request). > I still don't see how anything could break unless the person issuing the 301 > wants it to break. Or maybe I'm just completely misunderstanding the issue? The issue is 'a'. Specs saying one thing, most user agents and servers another... Regards Henrik
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2007 10:35:57 UTC