ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2007 by author

Adrian Chadd

• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Saturday, 31 March)
• pipelined client/server behaviour (Wednesday, 28 March)

Adrien de Croy

• proposed mods to draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: HTTP Request Forwarding? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Monday, 12 February)
• RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Sunday, 4 February)

Alexey Melnikov

• Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (Saturday, 17 March)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Fwd: [Standards-discuss] [HTML in email] (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Monday, 12 February)

Asbjørn Ulsberg

• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Tuesday, 6 February)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: Thought on ABNF upgrade (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)

Danny Ayers

• http-link-header in GRDDL (Thursday, 8 February)

David Morris

• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: products in Server header field (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea (Friday, 12 January)
• Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Friday, 5 January)

David Thielen

• Re: Extension to HTTP : TimeZone (Sunday, 11 February)

Dr. Reda

• Call for Submissions: ICIMP 2007 & ICDT 2007 & ICGD&BC 2007, Silicon Valley, July 1-6, 2007 (Tuesday, 13 February)

Eric Lawrence

• RE: pipelined client/server behaviour (Wednesday, 28 March)
• RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (Friday, 23 March)
• RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (Friday, 23 March)
• RE: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Friday, 9 March)
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)

Harry Halpin

• Re: http-link-header in GRDDL (Sunday, 11 February)

Henrik Nordstrom

• RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Thought on ABNF upgrade (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Removing Content-Location (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: products in Server header field (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 (Sunday, 18 February)
• [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 (Sunday, 18 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Updating Entity Headers with 304s (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Sunday, 4 February)
• Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Sunday, 4 February)
• Re: etag vs if-* vs range vs content-encoding? (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: 3.2.2 issue (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Message delimiting security issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements (Friday, 12 January)
• New issue: 6.1.1 can on a quick reading be misread that it's a complete list of status codes (Thursday, 11 January)
• New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) (Wednesday, 3 January)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Link Header draft (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Tuesday, 13 February)

Jamie Lokier

• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: HTTP idea (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Large content size value (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Large content size value (Saturday, 6 January)

Jeffrey Mogul

• Re: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Tuesday, 6 February)

Joe Gregorio

• Re: Link Header draft (Friday, 16 February)

Joe Orton

• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)

Joris Dobbelsteen

• RE: HTTP idea (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Thursday, 4 January)

Julian Reschke

• HTTP Vocabulary in RDF (Saturday, 24 March)
• Thought on ABNF upgrade (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 (Sunday, 18 February)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 (Sunday, 18 February)
• HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Monday, 12 February)
• Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Saturday, 3 February)
• [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue (Wednesday, 24 January)
• NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• NEW ISSUE: updating from RFC2048 to RFC4288 (Friday, 5 January)
• Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) (Wednesday, 3 January)

Junta Médica Virtual

• Programa de Intercambio Clínico: Presente sus Casos Críticos a sus Colegas (Friday, 9 March)

Justin Erenkrantz

• Re: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: products in Server header field (Tuesday, 6 March)

Keith Moore

• Re: Fwd: [Standards-discuss] [HTML in email] (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Fwd: [Standards-discuss] [HTML in email] (Wednesday, 21 February)

Larry Masinter

• RE: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Straw-man charter (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• RE: Message delimiting security issues (Friday, 19 January)
• RE: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: HTTP idea (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Tuesday, 2 January)

Lisa Dusseault

• Fwd: [Standards-discuss] [HTML in email] (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements (Thursday, 11 January)

lists@ingostruck.de

• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Thursday, 18 January)

Mark Baker

• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: 3.2.2 issue (Monday, 22 January)
• 3.2.2 issue (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) (Thursday, 4 January)

Mark Nottingham

• Section 13 (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Straw-man charter (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Informal get-together in Prague - Details (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Informal get-together in Prague - Details (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Link Header draft (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-00.txt (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-stale-while-revalidate-00.txt (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: Updating Entity Headers with 304s (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: Updating Entity Headers with 304s (Saturday, 10 February)
• Updating Entity Headers with 304s (Saturday, 10 February)
• Informal get-together in Prague (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Sunday, 28 January)
• Link Header draft (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Monday, 15 January)
• i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Sort 1.3 Terminology (Monday, 1 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Monday, 1 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: editorial bug in 13.5.1 (Monday, 1 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos (Monday, 1 January)
• Re: Allow is not in 13.5.2 (Monday, 1 January)
• Re: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos (Monday, 1 January)

Mike Dierken

• Re: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea (Friday, 12 January)

Mike Schinkel

• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Saturday, 10 March)
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Friday, 9 March)
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: HTTP Request Forwarding? (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: HTTP Request Forwarding? (Thursday, 8 March)
• HTTP Request Forwarding? (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: Link Header draft (Saturday, 24 February)
• RE: Link Header draft (Saturday, 17 February)

Mike Whitehurst

• Re: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Tuesday, 2 January)

Nicholas Shanks

• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea (Thursday, 11 January)
• HTTP idea (Thursday, 11 January)

Nicolas Krebs

• products in Server header field (Thursday, 1 March)

PA

• etag vs if-* vs range vs content-encoding? (Thursday, 1 February)

Paul Leach

• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) (Wednesday, 3 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Tuesday, 2 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Tuesday, 2 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Tuesday, 2 January)

Robert Sayre

• Re: Straw-man charter (Thursday, 8 March)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Updating Entity Headers with 304s (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Saturday, 3 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Large content size value (Thursday, 4 January)

S. Mike Dierken

• RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] (Sunday, 4 February)

Scott Lawrence

• RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Friday, 5 January)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Link Header draft (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Link Header draft (Monday, 12 February)

Thomas Roessler

• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? (Thursday, 15 March)

Travis Snoozy

• Re: HTTP Request Forwarding? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Wednesday, 17 January)

Travis Snoozy (Volt)

• Warning and Date (Monday, 8 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Monday, 8 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: Large content size value (Thursday, 4 January)
• NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Tuesday, 2 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Tuesday, 2 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Tuesday, 2 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Tuesday, 2 January)
• RE: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos (Tuesday, 2 January)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Tuesday, 2 January)
• RE: Allow is not in 13.5.2 (Tuesday, 2 January)
• OT: Effective Spec Writing [was RE: Large content size value] (Tuesday, 2 January)

William A. Rowe, Jr.

• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Message delimiting security issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Large content size value (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: Large content size value (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Tuesday, 2 January)

Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)

• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Saturday, 31 March)
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-pettersen-cache-context-00.txt (Wednesday, 28 February)

Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen

• Reminder: Comments on Domain Structure and cookie drafts requested (Tuesday, 16 January)

Yves Lafon

• Re: New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests (Wednesday, 17 January)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2007 16:51:37 UTC