- From: Paul Leach <paulle@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:20:34 -0800
- To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
- CC: "Travis Snoozy (Volt)" <a-travis@microsoft.com>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net] Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:11 PM To: Paul Leach Cc: Travis Snoozy (Volt); ietf-http-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 [Paul Leach] Travis said: > A strict interpretation of this would mean that other non-user-agent > clients (e.g., proxies) "MUST NOT" give an Accept-Language header in > their requests, because they can not (easily) give users a "choice of > linguistic preference". That could lead to all sorts of silliness (e.g., > proxies stripping Accept-Language before forwarding) that very likely > isn't intended. [Paul Leach] A proxy is "configured" for the Accept-Language headers of the requests it makes by the requests it receives. [Paul Leach] Back to what William said: I'd suggest we please leave the existing text alone and leave it to the implementor to determine if and how Accept-Language should be presented. [Paul Leach] I suggest they follow the intention of the spec, which is clear enough.
Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 01:21:29 UTC