- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:04:39 -0800
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mar 8, 2007, at 2:37 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > In terms of implementing it's quite disappointing that spec writers > don't always see a clear message that the industry doesn't want it > the way things are specified and instead requests a different > approach. The specification writers did more to implement HTTP than every single browser vendor still in business. It's not our fault that some folks are too lazy to read a specification that clearly defined the redirect method since 1995 (when Henrik convinced an entire WG that we should define the codes as implemented in CERN/W3C libwww). None of your implementations predate the specification and everyone participating in the process agreed to the status code definitions. It's not our fault that you have no spine and won't report errors to users. It's not our fault that you prefer to act like lemmings instead of standing up for your own businesses. ....Roy
Received on Friday, 9 March 2007 01:04:39 UTC