www-webont-wg@w3.org from June 2003 by date

Monday, 30 June 2003

• Re: ISSUE 5.3 Semantic Layering Jos De_Roo
• Re: ISSUE 5.3 Semantic Layering Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE 5.3 Semantic Layering Jos De_Roo
• Re: update on I18N review of RDF, OWL Martin Duerst
• Re: S&AS typo hasValue Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: S&AS typo hasValue Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE 5.3 Semantic Layering Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE 5.3 Semantic Layering Jeremy Carroll
• S&AS typo hasValue Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 29 June 2003

• Re: ISSUE 5.3 Semantic Layering Jos De_Roo
• Re: ISSUE 5.3 Semantic Layering Jeremy Carroll

Saturday, 28 June 2003

• TEST: obsoleted owl:sameIndividualAs [Was: Proposed minutes for 6/26] Jos De_Roo
• Re: ISSUE 5.3 Semantic Layering Jos De_Roo

Friday, 27 June 2003

• Re: ISSUE 5.3 Semantic Layering Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Proposal to Open and Postpone new issue - compound keys Smith, Michael K

Thursday, 26 June 2003

• Keys paper Ian Horrocks

Friday, 27 June 2003

• Re: Propsed response to QA-WG Dan Connolly
• Proposal to Open and Postpone new issue - compound keys Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed minutes for 6/26 Jim Hendler
• Proposed minutes for 6/26 Christopher Welty
• Re: ISSUE 5.3 Semantic Layering Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE 5.3 Semantic Layering: impact on TEST of if-then Jeremy Carroll
• Possible response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0081 Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 26 June 2003

• keys for free paper just mentioned Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: ISSUE 4.6 equivalentTo: reopned + proposal to close Dan Connolly
• Regrets for 2003-06-26 telecon Nick Gibbins
• Re: update on I18N review of RDF, OWL Dan Connolly
• specifying minimal datatypes without reference to "OWL Tools" Dan Connolly
• Greetings Mehrdad Omidvari
• Re: Agenda for June 26 telecon Jeff Heflin
• Re: Agenda for June 26 telecon Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Fwd: [webont-01] rdfcore issue 'rename schema' Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 25 June 2003

• Re: Agenda for June 26 telecon Frank van Harmelen
• Agenda for June 26 telecon Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0047 Jim Hendler
• Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0047 Jeremy Carroll
• regrets for 6/26 telecon yasser.alsafadi@philips.com
• Re: Probable regrets, 26th June Sean Bechhofer
• ISSUE 4.6 equivalentTo: reopned + proposal to close Guus Schreiber
• Probable regrets, 26th June Sean Bechhofer
• Re: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs [agenda request] Sean Bechhofer

Tuesday, 24 June 2003

• Re: SEM: AS&S Comprehension conditions (principles) Jos De_Roo
• Re: proposed response to Jeff Pan's response of 23 June concerning datatypes Jeff Z. Pan
• regrets for 10 July, and limited connectivity till then Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs [agenda request] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs [agenda request] Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs [agenda request] Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to: e: Restriction, DeprecatedClass in OWL Language Reference 31 March 2003 Jim Hendler
• Proposed response to: e: Restriction, DeprecatedClass in OWL Language Reference 31 March 2003 Guus Schreiber
• Re: Proposed response to: #owlref-rdfcore-class-ontology Jim Hendler
• Proposed response to: #owlref-rdfcore-class-ontology Guus Schreiber

Monday, 23 June 2003

• test msg Jeremy Carroll
• Re: proposed response to Jeff Pan's response of 23 June concerning datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• Re: proposed response to Jeff Pan's response of 23 June concerning datatypes Jim Hendler
• Re: proposed response to Jeff Pan's response of 23 June concerning datatypes Dan Connolly
• Re: proposed response to Jeff Pan's response of 23 June concerning datatypes Jonathan Borden
• Re: proposed response to Jeff Pan's response of 23 June concerning datatypes Jim Hendler
• Re: proposed response to Jeff Pan's response of 23 June concerning datatypes Dan Connolly
• proposed response to Jeff Pan's response of 23 June concerning datatypes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Workshop on PRACTICAL AND SCALABLE SEMANTIC SYSTEMS (2nd Call for Papers) Raphael Volz
• Re: Proposed response to Graham Klyne Sean Bechhofer
• Status of Closed comments (6/22) Jim Hendler
• SEM: AS&S Comprehension conditions (principles) Jos De_Roo

Sunday, 22 June 2003

• Re: Proposed response to Graham Klyne Jim Hendler

Saturday, 21 June 2003

• Re: non-entailment test for imports (was Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed Solution: Non-global Keys Ian Horrocks
• Re: non-entailment test for imports (was Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue) Ian Horrocks
• Re: Proposed response to Graham Klyne Ian Horrocks
• Re: LC comment status: formazlized, hypertext Dan Connolly
• Re: Telecon Minutes - 19 June 2003 Dan Connolly

Friday, 20 June 2003

• Re: Process document and publications Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Namespaces in guide ontologies Jeff Heflin
• Re: Proposed response to: inadequate reference in Owl REF Jim Hendler
• Process document and publications Jim Hendler
• RE: Editorial Change: links between OWL docs Frank van Harmelen
• RE: Editorial Change: links between OWL docs Smith, Michael K
• Proposed response to: inadequate reference in Owl REF Guus Schreiber
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeff Heflin
• Re: Proposed response to Graham Klyne Sean Bechhofer
• Re: Proposed response to Graham Klyne Jim Hendler
• RE: Editorial Change: links between OWL docs Jeremy Carroll
• no explicit type on bnodes Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Editorial Change: links between OWL docs Frank van Harmelen
• Re: question about DL/Lite semantics + agenda request Jos De_Roo
• Re: Proposed response to Graham Klyne Sean Bechhofer
• Re: WOWG: agenda editor's telecon June 19 Mike Dean
• XSD anchor Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Fwd: daml:item Jeremy Carroll
• Re: question about DL/Lite semantics + agenda request Jeremy Carroll
• Re: B1 B2 proof Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 19 June 2003

• Re: Proposed response to Graham Klyne Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jim Hendler
• Re: Draft Telecon Minutes - 19 June 2003 Sandro Hawke
• Fwd: daml:item Jim Hendler
• Telecon Minutes - 19 June 2003 Smith, Michael K
• Re: Draft Telecon Minutes - 19 June 2003 Guus Schreiber
• Re: Draft Telecon Minutes - 19 June 2003 Guus Schreiber
• Draft Telecon Minutes - 19 June 2003 Smith, Michael K
• belated regrets: 6/19 telecon Leo Obrst
• owl:sameAs proposed changes to TEST Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Editorial Change: links between OWL docs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Proposed response to Graham Klyne Ian Horrocks
• regrets for telecon Deborah L. McGuinness
• RE: Namespaces in guide ontologies Smith, Michael K
• Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeff Heflin
• Re: Proposed response to: OWL Reference comment - RDF Schema for OWL Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to: Comments on Owl REF document Dan Connolly
• Regrets - Phonecon - Stanton Stanton, John
• Re: Namespaces in guide ontologies Jeremy Carroll
• Proposed response to: OWL Reference comment - RDF Schema for OWL Guus Schreiber
• Proposed response to: Comments on Owl REF document Guus Schreiber
• ACTION owlOntologyProperty in Reference Guus Schreiber
• Re: Proposed Solution: Non-global Keys Dan Connolly
• Regrets for 2003-06-19 telecon Nick Gibbins
• Namespaces in guide ontologies Sean Bechhofer
• Propsed response to QA-WG Sandro Hawke
• Re: Layering bug? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Editorial Change: links between OWL docs Guus Schreiber
• Re: Layering bug? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Editorial Change: links between OWL docs Sandro Hawke
• WOWG: agenda editor's telecon June 19 Guus Schreiber
• Re: Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0053.ht ml Sean Bechhofer

Wednesday, 18 June 2003

• Re: Minor comments about the Overview document Frank van Harmelen
• Re: LC comment status: formazlized, hypertext Dan Connolly
• Re: language subsets and complexity [was: Minutes of June 12 Telecon] Ian Horrocks
• LC comment status: formazlized, hypertext Dan Connolly
• Layering bug? Jeremy Carroll
• WOWG: telecon tomorrow = editor's meeting Guus Schreiber
• Fwd: [webont-01] rdfcore issue 'rename schema' Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 17 June 2003

• Re: language subsets and complexity [was: Minutes of June 12 Telecon] Dan Connolly
• CALL FOR PAPERS : Workshop on Regulatory Ontologies and the Modeling of Complaint Regulations Mustafa Jarrar
• Re: Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0053.ht ml Dan Connolly
• Re: [Fwd: Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue] Dan Connolly
• Re: non-entailment test for imports (was Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue) Jos De_Roo
• Re: [Fwd: Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue] Dan Connolly
• [Fwd: Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue] Jeff Heflin
• Re: Minutes of June 12 Telecon Ian Horrocks
• Re: non-entailment test for imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Dan Connolly
• non-entailment test for imports (was Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue) Jim Hendler
• [moved to rdf-logic] Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeff Heflin
• [move to rdf-logic] was Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Ian Horrocks
• RE: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Ian Horrocks
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0053.ht ml Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0053.html Sean Bechhofer
• RE: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs [proposed reply] Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Proposed Solution: Non-global Keys Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs [proposed reply] Dan Connolly

Monday, 16 June 2003

• Re: Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0047.html Dan Connolly
• Re: update on I18N review of RDF, OWL Martin Duerst
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jonathan Borden
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeff Heflin
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jonathan Borden
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to Alan Rector (QCRs) Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed Reply to Martin Merry -- New attempt Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to Alan Rector (QCRs) Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to Alan Rector (QCRs) Jim Hendler
• Re: revised proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0083.ht ml Jim Hendler
• Re: revised proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0083.ht ml Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: revised proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0083.ht ml Jim Hendler
• Proposed response to Alan Rector (QCRs) Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Guus Schreiber
• Re: Comment approvals Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• revised proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0083.html Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Proposed Reply to Martin Merry -- New attempt Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeff Heflin
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Smith, Michael K
• Re: Proposed response to: Missing AllSame Jim Hendler
• Proposed response to: Missing AllSame Guus Schreiber

Sunday, 15 June 2003

• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jim Hendler

Friday, 13 June 2003

• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP pat hayes
• Re: draft response to #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation pat hayes
• Re: Minutes of June 12 Telecon Dan Connolly
• Re: Minutes of June 12 Telecon Dan Connolly
• Re: draft response to #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation pat hayes
• Re: draft response to #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation pat hayes
• Re: draft response to #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation pat hayes
• Re: WOWG: IMPORTANT - LC Comments List - Look for your name Dan Connolly
• RE: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jim Hendler
• Re: Test cases review from RDF Core Jim Hendler
• Comment approvals (was Re: Minutes of June 12 Telecon) Jim Hendler
• Decidability v. complexirty (was RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP) Jim Hendler
• NOTE-owl-xmlsyntax-20030611 published Dan Connolly
• changes in RDF abstract syntax (literals) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Minutes of June 12 Telecon Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Smith, Michael K
• Test cases review from RDF Core Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Minutes of June 12 Telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Minutes of June 12 Telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Minutes of June 12 Telecon Charles White
• RE: proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0052.ht ml Jim Hendler
• RE: OWL Tests with First Order reasoner. Jim Hendler
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jeremy Carroll
• RE: OWL Tests with First Order reasoner. Jeremy Carroll
• RE: proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0052.html Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL in RDF Sean Bechhofer
• Re: OWL in RDF Sean Bechhofer
• Re: OWL in RDF Sean Bechhofer
• Re: OWL in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL Tests with First Order reasoner. Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL in RDF Jeremy Carroll
• OWL in RDF Sean Bechhofer
• Re: OWL Tests with First Order reasoner. Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL Tests with First Order reasoner. Sean Bechhofer
• Re: OWL Tests with First Order reasoner. Jim Hendler
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jim Hendler
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jim Hendler

Thursday, 12 June 2003

• Re: draft response to #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation Jonathan Borden
• Re: draft response to #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation Jos De_Roo
• RE: Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/pub lic-webont-comments/2003Apr/0046.html Smith, Michael K
• Re: Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0046.html Guus Schreiber
• Re: draft response to #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation Jeremy Carroll
• Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0046.html Frank van Harmelen
• Re: Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0047.html Guus Schreiber
• Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0047.html Frank van Harmelen
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jeremy Carroll
• Re: draft response to #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL Tests with First Order reasoner. Sean Bechhofer
• draft response to #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation pat hayes
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jerome Euzenat
• email test:ignore this message pat hayes
• Regrets for 2003-06-12 telecon Nick Gibbins
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Smith, Michael K
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Smith, Michael K
• Guide: Reference to new appendix in Reference Smith, Michael K
• RE: Response to QA comments, Comment on QA draft Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Response to QA comments, Comment on QA draft Sandro Hawke
• Re: WOWG: agenda June 12 telecon Frank van Harmelen
• New appendix in Reference Guus Schreiber
• RE: WOWG: Response to HP -- some changes (Guide, Overview, Ref) we may need to make Jeremy Carroll
• WOWG: agenda June 12 telecon (revised) Guus Schreiber
• Re: WOWG: agenda June 12 telecon Frank van Harmelen
• Re: Response to QA comments, Comment on QA draft Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Response to QA comments, Comment on QA draft Jim Hendler
• Response to QA comments, Comment on QA draft Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 11 June 2003

• Re: B1 B2 proof Jos De_Roo
• RE: ISSUE: unnamed individual restrictions Smith, Michael K
• RE: Need a test -- inverse and oneOf Jim Hendler
• RE: Need a test -- inverse and oneOf Jos De_Roo
• Re: B1 B2 proof Guus Schreiber
• regrets for 6/12 telecom yasser.alsafadi@philips.com
• RE: Need a test -- inverse and oneOf Charles White
• Re: WOWG: Response to HP -- some changes (Guide, Overview, Ref) we may need to make Frank van Harmelen
• Action: review Jeremy's review of QA last call ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: Proposed partial response to: RDFCore comments on Reference Dan Connolly
• Re: B1 B2 proof Jeremy Carroll
• Re: B1 B2 proof Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Need a test -- inverse and oneOf Dan Connolly
• Re: Need a test -- inverse and oneOf Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WOWG: agenda June 12 telecon (domain/range in ref) Dan Connolly
• update on I18N review of RDF, OWL Dan Connolly
• RE: Need a test -- inverse and oneOf Charles White
• Re: WOWG: agenda June 12 telecon Mike Dean
• regrets for 12 June Tim Finin
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions [proposed reply] Dan Connolly
• WOWG: agenda June 12 telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: ISSUE: unnamed individual restrictions Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OPENING ISSUE (was Re: ISSUE: unnamed individual restrictions) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Need a test -- inverse and oneOf Jim Hendler
• Re: Need a test -- inverse and oneOf Sean Bechhofer
• Re: ISSUE: unnamed individual restrictions Guus Schreiber
• Re: OWL DL in RDF Sean Bechhofer
• Need a test -- inverse and oneOf Jim Hendler
• OPENING ISSUE (was Re: ISSUE: unnamed individual restrictions) Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL DL in RDF Jeremy Carroll
• proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0052.html Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE: unnamed individual restrictions Jeremy Carroll

Monday, 9 June 2003

• Re: Proposed response to Ken Laskey (general misgivings on OWL design) Dan Connolly
• RE: Issues list Smith, Michael K
• Proposed response to Ken Laskey (general misgivings on OWL design) Jim Hendler
• Issues list Jim Hendler
• WOWG: Response to HP -- some changes (Guide, Overview, Ref) we may need to make Jim Hendler
• OWL Tests with First Order reasoner. Sean Bechhofer
• Test: I5.2/premises006 Sean Bechhofer
• Re: issues with respect to the test cases overall manifest document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: comments on Euler owl rules Jos De_Roo

Saturday, 7 June 2003

• Re: issues with respect to the test cases overall manifest document Jos De_Roo
• issues with respect to the test cases overall manifest document Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 6 June 2003

• Re: RDFS closures, polite discourse Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDFS closures, polite discourse Dan Connolly
• Re: WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues Christopher Welty
• Re: RDFS closures, polite discourse Christopher Welty
• Re: WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues Christopher Welty
• Re: manifest file for OWL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: manifest file for OWL tests Jos De_Roo
• regrets for 12 June Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• manifest file for OWL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues Jeremy Carroll
• Re: comments on Euler owl rules (+polite discourse) Dan Connolly
• Re: RDFS closures, polite discourse Dan Connolly
• Re: comments on Euler owl rules Jos De_Roo
• Re: comments on Euler owl rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: comments on Euler owl rules Jos De_Roo
• comments on Euler owl rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Wine Ontology Smith, Michael K
• Re: Minutes of Web Ontology Working Group teleconference of June 5, 2003 Jos De_Roo
• Re: Minutes of Web Ontology Working Group teleconference of June 5, 2003 Jos De_Roo
• Re: Minutes of Web Ontology Working Group teleconference of June 5, 2003 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Minutes of Web Ontology Working Group teleconference of June 5, 2003 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Minutes of Web Ontology Working Group teleconference of June 5, 2003 Jos De_Roo

Thursday, 5 June 2003

• Re: Minutes of Web Ontology Working Group teleconference of June 5, 2003 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Guide glossary Smith, Michael K
• RE: Minutes of Web Ontology Working Group teleconference of June 5, 2003 Smith, Michael K
• Re: Minutes of Web Ontology Working Group teleconference of June 5, 2003 Jos De_Roo
• RE: Species Validation and the Guide Wine Ontology. Smith, Michael K
• belated regrets: telecon, 06/05/03 Leo Obrst
• Minutes of Web Ontology Working Group teleconference of June 5, 2003 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Agenda/Logistics telecon June 4, 2003 Smith, Michael K
• regrets for june 5 telecom yasser.alsafadi@philips.com
• Re: WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: question on embedding Dan Connolly
• Re: WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues Jim Hendler
• Re: WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues Dan Connolly
• question on embedding Christopher Welty
• Re: WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues Christopher Welty
• Re: Wine Ontology Christopher Welty
• Re: Agenda/Logistics telecon June 4, 2003 Guus Schreiber
• proposed addition to today's teleconference (was Re: Agenda/Logistics telecon June 4, 2003) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• status of my action items in Agenda/Logistics telecon June 4, 2003 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed addendum to reply to unnamed-ontologies comment Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: question about DL/Lite semantics Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdf:XMLLiteral disallowed or permitted? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html Jeremy Carroll
• Regrets for 2003-06-05 telecon Masahiro Hori
• Wine Ontology Charles White

Wednesday, 4 June 2003

• TEST: Re: Agenda/Logistics telecon June 4, 2003 Jos De_Roo
• Fwd: OWL test cases and e-Wallet Jim Hendler
• Re: proposed addendum to reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0050.ht ml Jim Hendler
• Regrets for 2003-06-05 telecon Charles White
• Re: proposed addendum to reply to unnamed-ontologies comment Dan Connolly
• Re: proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html Dan Connolly
• Re: question about DL/Lite semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Regrets for 2003-06-05 telecon Nick Gibbins
• proposed addendum to reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0050.html Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Agenda Amendment for tomorrow's telecon Jim Hendler
• Re: rdf:XMLLiteral disallowed or permitted? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Agenda/Logistics telecon June 4, 2003 Jim Hendler
• Re: Vocabulary usage in test.. Jeremy Carroll
• B1 B2 proof Jeremy Carroll
• Proposed partial response to: RDFCore comments on Reference Guus Schreiber
• Re: rdfs:Literal not a RDF datatype Guus Schreiber
• Re: rdfs:Literal not a RDF datatype Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: regrets Marwan Sabbouh
• regrets Ian Horrocks
• rdfs:Literal not a RDF datatype Guus Schreiber
• Vocabulary usage in test.. Sean Bechhofer

Tuesday, 3 June 2003

• Re: question about DL/Lite semantics Jeremy Carroll
• Re: separating consistency, conformance from the state of the web Jeff Heflin

Monday, 2 June 2003

• Re: OWL DL in RDF Sean Bechhofer
• Re: question about DL/Lite semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Guide glossary Guus Schreiber
• question about DL/Lite semantics Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 1 June 2003

• Re: SEM: common class concept Jos De_Roo
• Re: Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0083.html Jeremy Carroll
• Re: SEM: common class concept Jeremy Carroll
• Re: SEM: common class concept Jeremy Carroll

Last message date: Monday, 30 June 2003 18:27:28 UTC