- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 02:30:00 +0200
- To: pfps@research.bell-labs.com
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
That's is a long story...
I felt free to add to owl-rules, now already version 1.149
and *try* to keep this consistent with S&AS.
We try to make the owl-comprehension-rules on demand,
ie based on the triple set to be proved, select out of
a denumerable set of comprehension rules.
I agree that the current testcase is diverging with the
S&AS but still believe in convergence as I don't see
what's wrong in assuming
rdfs:Class rdf:type _:iii.
_:iii owl:intersectionOf _:lll.
_:lll rdf:first rdfs:Class.
_:lll rdf:rest rdf:nil.
--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
"Peter F.
Patel-Schneider" To: Jos De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER@AGFA
<pfps@research.bell cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
-labs.com> Subject: Re: Minutes of Web Ontology Working Group teleconference of
June 5, 2003
2003-06-06 02:15 AM
From: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Subject: Re: Minutes of Web Ontology Working Group teleconference of June
5, 2003
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 02:10:41 +0200
>
> I did a test with just adding
>
> rdfs:Class rdf:type _:iii.
> _:iii owl:intersectionOf _:lll.
> _:lll rdf:first rdfs:Class.
> _:lll rdf:rest rdf:nil.
>
> to our owl-comprension-rules premises
> (but in this case we don't need rules
> with skolem ft's in their conclusions)
> and all test cases are then still OK.
I don't understand what you are doing here. How can you add these triples
to the owl-comprehension-rules premises.
> Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
peter
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2003 20:30:09 UTC