- From: Smith, Michael K <michael.smith@eds.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:28:37 -0500
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87CE68334664A54C81F8DF312343A3FF01C11805@USPLM207>
Done. New issues list uploaded. -----Original Message----- From: Jim Hendler [mailto:hendler@cs.umd.edu] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:02 AM To: www-webont-wg@w3.org Cc: Smith, Michael K Subject: Proposal to Open and Postpone new issue - compound keys Mike- here is a new issue to raise, and as chair I declare it open (below is a proposal to close by POSTPONING) TITLE: Compound Keys DESCRIPTION: Relational Databases often use keys that are composed of multiple fields. OWL allows keys using owl:InverseFunctionalProperty for a single field (property). It would be desirable for OWL to provide the compound keys capability as well. STATUS: Open RAISED BY: J. Hendler based on a Last Call comment raised by Bob MacGregor: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0019.html -------- Proposal to POSTPONE this issue While compounds keys would be desirable to add, there is some difficulty in adding them in the current OWL syntax, similar to the problem arising for "qualified" properties (see discussion under issue 3.2). In addition, for the OWL DL profile, it is still something of a research issue as to how these are best realized by DL reasoners. There is also a question as to whether mixing datatype and object type in a compound key would be allowed, and whether it would cause difficulties to reasoners. -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 *** 240-277-3388 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 16:29:02 UTC