- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:44:26 +0200
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
For those who were not at the telecon yesterday, issue 5.3 got reopened. A possible way of closing it again would be to change from: [[ - on Fast OWL, these two model theories hopefully correspond: if KB+C is in Fast OWL, then KB large-OWL-entails C iff KB Fast-OWL-entails C ]] to [[ - on OWL DL, the OWL DL model theory is strictly weaker than the OWL Full model theory that is: If KB OWL-DL-entails C then KB OWL-Full-entails C ]] At least the following changes would need to be to Test: Minor wording changes (five or six times) in http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-test-20030528/#testTypes e.g. [[ Such entailment is defined by the OWL semantics [OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax], (see also OWL Full entailment). ]] would need a little clarification Section 4.1.2 http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-test-20030528/#consistencyConformance currently defines 'consistent' as if the concept in OWL Full and the concpet in OWL DL coincided. This would probably need to be changed to 'DL-consistent' and 'Full-consistent'. (I have no particular attachment to those phrases). in section 4.2.2 http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-test-20030528/#consistencyChecker would need editorial work on the first bit, probably adding: [[ An OWL consistency checker MUST provide a means to determine the model theory (direct or rdfs compatible) that it is using; for example, in its supporting documentation. ]] the last bit would need to go through the four checkers defined and define which model theory each MUST use. This would then result that a consistency checker that uses the OWL Full model theory but only operates on OWL Lite documents is an OWL Full consistency checker not an OWL Lite one. Thus this note would need rework: [[ Note: Every OWL Full consistency checker is also an OWL DL consistency checker. Every OWL DL consistency checker is also an OWL Lite consistency checker. The different levels are intended to be used to indicate the intended domain of a consistency checker. ]] Section 5.2 concerning testing a consistency checker would need some changes http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-test-20030528/#runningConsistencyChecker Section 6 on Manifest files would need some change, so that a test can have multiple levels. All the current Lite tests would need to be relabelled as Lite, DL, and Full tests. All the current DL tests would need to be relabelled as DL and Full tests New tests corresponding to the problem cases would need to be added which are only DL (consistnet) or Full (inconsistent) etc. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 08:44:52 UTC