- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 18:08:38 +0200
- To: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Have RDF Core been formally asked to review OWL Test Cases. They specifically do not want to review all the tests. We could ask them to review the text; and maybe the following tests, which do not involve any OWL vocabulary: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/byIssue#I5.24-001 http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/byIssue#I5.5-003 http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/byIssue#I5.5-004 http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/proposedByIssue#I5.8-011 and maybe also the following in which the use of OWL vocabulary is not significant: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/proposed-misc-200-xmlliteral#miscellaneous-201 http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/proposedByIssue#I5.8-006 http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/proposedByIssue#I5.8-007 http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/proposedByIssue#I5.8-008 http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/proposedByIssue#I5.8-009 Jeremy
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 12:08:27 UTC