Re: ISSUE: unnamed individual restrictions

Jeremy,

I will include this in tomorrow's agenda. Could you provide a 
link/message with a description of the rationale for postponing?

Thanks, Guus

> TITLE: unnamed individual restrictions
> 
> DESCRIPTION:
> The restrictions placed on b-nodes may limit the
> applicability of OWL DL to an unnecessarily restricted subset of RDF
> instance data, for which no such restrictions apply.
> 
> Specifically we request, that in Owl DL and Owl lite:
> 
>    a) that a b-node representing an individual may be the object of more
> than one triple
>    b) that cycles of b-nodes representing individuals be allowed.
> 
> RAISED BY:
> RDF Core
>  
> STATUS:
> POSTPONED (proposed)
> 
>  
> REFERENCE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0052.html



-- 
Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718
E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/

Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:50:14 UTC