- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 17 Jun 2003 15:38:19 -0500
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 07:11, Jim Hendler wrote: > Sean - This looks okay with me, however I'd be more comfortable if > DanC would take a look at it as well. If he's okay with it, send it. Yes, please send it. > - JH > > > > At 10:21 AM +0100 6/17/03, Sean Bechhofer wrote: > >Brian > > > >Thanks for your comments[1]. > > > >[[ > >owlref-rdfcore-relationship-to-RDF > > > >RDFCore are concerned about the clarity in the OWL specifications of what > >RDF is legal OWL DL and OWL lite. This seems to be described only in S+AS > >which is a highly technical document and is likely to be inaccessible to > >many. On reviewing the reference document some significant restrictions > >were not apparent to the RDFCore reviewer. We cannot be confident, > >therefore, that other restrictions we would care about, have not been > >missed. > > > >RDFCore requests that the specifications be amended to include a > >description of necessary conditions for a RDF document to be in OWL DL and > >OWL Lite. This description should be as accurate as possible consistent > >with a goal of it being comprehensible to a majority of the community. > > > >Such a description may bring to light further issues. > >]] > > > >An appendix has been added to the OWL Reference Doc (Appendix E: Rules > >of Thumb for OWL Ontologies [2]). This appendix is intended to address > >precisely this issue: which RDF graphs are legal OWL DL and OWL > >Lite. Of course this is not intended as an normative description -- > >the finer details are still contained within the S+AS. However, the > >appendix presents some general rules which, if followed, should ensure > >that graphs are legal DL/Lite. Rather than providing a formal > >characterisation of DL/Lite, one can view the philosophy of the rules > >as "if you follow these, you'll be ok.". > > > >Please respond, copying public-webont-comments@w3.org, as to whether > >you are satisfied with this response. > > > >Sean Bechhofer > > > >[1] > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0053.html > >[2] http://www.daml.org/2002/06/webont/owl-ref-proposed#app-DLinRDF > > > > > > > > > >-- > >Sean Bechhofer > >seanb@cs.man.ac.uk > >http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 16:37:54 UTC