- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 16:03:31 +0200
- To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Jim Hendler" <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
> This might be an enormous rathole. If there is disagreement about > this, let's not get sucked in purely on account of extensibility being > one of the QA guidelines. > Personally I suspect it is a rathole. One of my headline comments was that the QA stuff seemed targetted at mature areas. These will have had experience of inappropriate extensions; which can be made illegal; and appropriate extensions which can be blessed individually or generically. I don't believe that the DAML+OIL experience gives us enough to go on vis-a-vis extensions to make the right call; so let's be quiet. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:03:30 UTC