Re: OWL in RDF

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 07:13:58 -0400 (EDT)
• To: seanb@cs.man.ac.uk
• Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20030613.071358.68529768.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
Subject: OWL in RDF
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:09:25 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)

> 
> 
> Just putting some extra words together for this appendix. I believe the
> following to be true, but would appreciate a quick sanity check:
> 
> [[
> With the exception of predicates within the OWL, RDF and RDFS
> namespaces, annotation properties are the <strong>only</strong> predicates
> that can appear in triples with an OWL class or property as the subject.
> ]]
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 	Sean

Well aside changing ``namespaces'' to ``vocabularies'', I believe this to
be true.  Of course, not all such predicates can appear in such triples.

peter

Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 07:14:09 UTC