- From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:16:22 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk> > Subject: OWL in RDF > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:09:25 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) > > > > > > > Just putting some extra words together for this appendix. I believe the > > following to be true, but would appreciate a quick sanity check: > > > > [[ > > With the exception of predicates within the OWL, RDF and RDFS > > namespaces, annotation properties are the <strong>only</strong> predicates > > that can appear in triples with an OWL class or property as the subject. > > ]] > > > > Cheers, > > > > Sean > > Well aside changing ``namespaces'' to ``vocabularies'', I believe this to > be true. Of course, not all such predicates can appear in such triples. Sure. Hopefully those extra restrictions are dealt with elsewhere in the appendix. Sean -- Sean Bechhofer seanb@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 07:18:11 UTC