- From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:29:25 +0200
- To: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Jim Hendler wrote: > > In working on my new version of my response to Martin Merry, > [...] > -- Editors, please let me know if > you accept these changes (or similar ones of your own chosing), if not, we > will need to schedule telecon time to discuss. > [...] > ----- Fixing Overview -------- > > Overview reads: > > (section 1.3) > OWL Lite supports those users primarily needing a classification hierarchy > and simple constraints. For example, while it supports cardinality > constraints, it only permits cardinality values of 0 or 1. It should be > simpler to provide tool support for OWL Lite than its more expressive > relatives, and OWL Lite provides a quick migration path for thesauri and > other taxonomies. > > I would add a sentence that reads: "Owl Lite also has a lower formal > complexity than OWL DL, see <reference section 8.3> for further details." I'm happy with this proposed fix. Frank. ----
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:18:12 UTC